Spring Cloud Contract Verifier - 正文匹配

Ole*_*dr 3 spring-boot spring-cloud spring-cloud-contract

我正在使用 Spring Cloud Contract Verifier

org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-starter-contract-verifier:jar:2.0.0.M8 org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-contract-maven-plugin:1.2.4.RELEASE

我有以下合同:

request:
  method: GET
  url: /cars/list
response:
  status: 200
  headers:
    Content-Type: application/json;charset=UTF-8
  body:
    cars:
      [
        {
          "make": "Ford",
          "model": "Fiesta",
          "year": 2016,
          "price": 16500.50
        },
        {
          "make": "BMW",
          "model": "X1",
          "year": 2014,
          "price": 22000.00
        },
        {
          "make": "NISSAN",
          "model": "Juke",
          "year": 2017,
          "price": 19300.00
        }
      ]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

然后在以下java代码中转换:

DocumentContext parsedJson = JsonPath.parse(response.getBody().asString());
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['model']").isEqualTo("Juke");
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['make']").isEqualTo("Ford");
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['year']").isEqualTo(2014);
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['year']").isEqualTo(2016);
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['model']").isEqualTo("Fiesta");
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['make']").isEqualTo("BMW");
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['year']").isEqualTo(2017);
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['make']").isEqualTo("NISSAN");
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['price']").isEqualTo(16500.5);
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['model']").isEqualTo("X1");
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['price']").isEqualTo(22000.0);
assertThatJson(parsedJson).array("['cars']").contains("['price']").isEqualTo(19300.0);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我对这个测试有几个问题:

1)它不考虑顺序,这意味着以下机构仍将被视为有效:

{
  "cars": [
    {
      "make": "NISSAN",
      "model": "Juke",
      "year": 2017,
      "price": 19300.00
    },
    {
      "make": "BMW",
      "model": "X1",
      "year": 2014,
      "price": 22000.00
    },
    {
      "make": "Ford",
      "model": "Fiesta",
      "year": 2016,
      "price": 16500.50
    }
  ]
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

2)它只是验证响应中的任何地方都存在某些属性,这意味着以下主体仍然被认为是有效的:

{
  "cars": [
    {
      "make": "Ford",
      "model": "Juke",
      "year": 2016,
      "price": 19300.00
    },
    {
      "make": "BMW",
      "model": "X1",
      "year": 2017,
      "price": 22000.00
    },
    {
      "make": "NISSAN",
      "model": "Fiesta",
      "year": 2014,
      "price": 16500.50
    }
  ]
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

3) 它忽略响应中存在的任何额外值,这意味着以下正文仍将被视为有效:

{
  "cars": [
    {
      "make": "Ford",
      "model": "Fiesta",
      "year": 2017,
      "price": 22000.00,
      "state": "good"
    },
    {
      "make": "NISSAN",
      "model": "Juke",
      "year": 2016,
      "price": 19300.00,
      "state": "ok"
    },
    {
      "make": "BMW",
      "model": "X1",
      "year": 2014,
      "price": 16500.50
    },
    {
      "make": "Volkswagen",
      "model": "Golf",
      "year": 2018,
      "price": 12500.00,
      "state": "new"
    }
  ]
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我希望生成的测试更加严格,并在上述案例中概述的任何差异上失败。

可以用 Spring Cloud Contract Verifier 实现吗?

Mar*_*zak 5

首先,您的版本不匹配

org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-starter-contract-verifier:jar:2.0.0.M8 org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-contract-maven-plugin:1.2.4.RELEASE

您正在使用与验证程序版本不同的插件。那些应该匹配。

现在回答你的问题

1)它不考虑顺序,这意味着以下机构仍将被视为有效:

是的,我们不会开箱即用地测试它。您可以通过为整个身体提供自己的 JSON 路径匹配器来手动完成(https://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-contract/single/spring-cloud-contract.html#contract-matchers)

2)它只是验证响应中的任何地方都存在某些属性,这意味着以下主体仍然被认为是有效的:

是的,我们断言结构没问题,这就是契约测试的想法。如果您想要更精确的验证,请使用匹配器部分(https://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-contract/single/spring-cloud-contract.html#contract-matchers)

3) 它忽略响应中存在的任何额外值,这意味着以下正文仍将被视为有效:

这绝对是你应该做的。忽略未知字段。您可以在此处阅读有关 Postel 定律的更多信息 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_principle )

我希望生成的测试更加严格,并在上述案例中概述的任何差异上失败。

我认为您正在寻找一种模式,而不是合同测试或定义。您可以使用 Spring Rest Docs 集成(https://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-contract/single/spring-cloud-contract.html#_generating_stubs_using_rest_docs)并在那里强制执行存根的外观。但是 IMO(当然我不知道你的域)你太严格了。