结合(a - > Maybe a)和(a - > a)函数

Sav*_*xey 3 haskell functional-programming function dot-operator

我有两个功能:

f :: a -> Maybe a
g :: a -> a
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我想创建这样的功能:

h :: a -> Maybe a

h x
| isJust(f x) = Just (g $ fromJust(f x))
| otherwise   = Nothing
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我怎样才能以更优雅的方式做到这一点?

Zet*_*eta 13

由于您使用标记了此问题:

h :: a -> Maybe a
h = fmap g . f
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

有关解释:

f            ::                          a -> Maybe a
g            ::        a ->       a
fmap g       ::  Maybe a -> Maybe a
(.)          :: (Maybe a -> Maybe a) -> (a -> Maybe a) -> (a -> Maybe a)
(.) (fmap g) ::                         (a -> Maybe a) -> (a -> Maybe a)
fmap g . f   ::                                           (a -> Maybe a)
h            ::                                            a -> Maybe a
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

请注意,(.)'s和fmap g's类型实际上更通用:

(.) :: (b -> c) -> (a -> b) -> (a -> c)
-- b in this case is Maybe a
-- c in this case is Maybe a

fmap g :: Functor f => f a -> f a
-- f in this case is Maybe
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

但是,您也可以对结果进行模式匹配f:

h x = 
  case f x of
    Just k -> Just (g k)
    _      -> Nothing
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

请注意,您的原始示例甚至不会编译,因为g返回类型不正确.


use*_*465 5

fmap2 :: (Functor g, Functor f) => (a -> b) -> g (f a) -> g (f b)
fmap2 = fmap . fmap
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这是一个有趣的方式:

h :: a -> Maybe a
h = fmap2 g f
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

fmap2 g f ~> fmap (fmap g) f ~> fmap g . f ~> \x -> fmap g (f x)

Functor ((->) r)实例这里使用:fmap可以用来代替(.).