Sav*_*xey 3 haskell functional-programming function dot-operator
我有两个功能:
f :: a -> Maybe a
g :: a -> a
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我想创建这样的功能:
h :: a -> Maybe a
h x
| isJust(f x) = Just (g $ fromJust(f x))
| otherwise = Nothing
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我怎样才能以更优雅的方式做到这一点?
Zet*_*eta 13
由于您使用点运算符标记了此问题:
h :: a -> Maybe a
h = fmap g . f
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
有关解释:
f :: a -> Maybe a
g :: a -> a
fmap g :: Maybe a -> Maybe a
(.) :: (Maybe a -> Maybe a) -> (a -> Maybe a) -> (a -> Maybe a)
(.) (fmap g) :: (a -> Maybe a) -> (a -> Maybe a)
fmap g . f :: (a -> Maybe a)
h :: a -> Maybe a
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
请注意,(.)'s和fmap g's类型实际上更通用:
(.) :: (b -> c) -> (a -> b) -> (a -> c)
-- b in this case is Maybe a
-- c in this case is Maybe a
fmap g :: Functor f => f a -> f a
-- f in this case is Maybe
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,您也可以对结果进行模式匹配f:
h x =
case f x of
Just k -> Just (g k)
_ -> Nothing
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
请注意,您的原始示例甚至不会编译,因为g返回类型不正确.
有
fmap2 :: (Functor g, Functor f) => (a -> b) -> g (f a) -> g (f b)
fmap2 = fmap . fmap
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这是一个有趣的方式:
h :: a -> Maybe a
h = fmap2 g f
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
fmap2 g f ~> fmap (fmap g) f ~> fmap g . f ~> \x -> fmap g (f x)
该Functor ((->) r)实例这里使用:fmap可以用来代替(.).