当我通过一个简单的Enum测试器迭代for-each循环和switch语句来输出枚举值时,我看到的行为对我来说似乎很奇怪.
码:
public class EnumTest {
private Number number;
public EnumTest(Number number) {
this.number = number;
}
public enum Number {
ONE,
TWO,
THREE,
FOUR,
FIVE;
}
private void tellItLikeItIs() {
switch (number) {
case ONE:
System.out.println("ONE");
case TWO:
System.out.println("TWO");
case THREE:
System.out.println("THREE");
case FOUR:
System.out.println("FOUR");
case FIVE:
System.out.println("FIVE");
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
for (Number n : Number.values()) {
EnumTest et = new EnumTest(n);
et.tellItLikeItIs();
System.out.println();
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
输出:
ONE
TWO
THREE
FOUR
FIVE
TWO …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 是否指定参数化泛型类型的继承关系不足以确保类型安全?例如:
public class ListCastFunction<F, T extends F> implements Function<F, T> {
public final T apply(final F from) {
return (T) from;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这仍然会生成编译器警告.如果我们知道T extends F,它真的没有检查吗?