Kar*_*ius 9 r coordinates sliding-window
我有一个数据表,其中nrow大约是一百万或两个,而ncol大约是200.
一行中的每个条目都有一个与之关联的坐标.
数据的微小部分:
[1,] -2.80331471 -0.8874522 -2.34401863 -3.811584 -2.1292443
[2,] 0.03177716 0.2588624 0.82877467 1.955099 0.6321881
[3,] -1.32954665 -0.5433407 -2.19211837 -2.342554 -2.2142461
[4,] -0.60771429 -0.9758734 0.01558774 1.651459 -0.8137684
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
前4行的坐标:
9928202 9928251 9928288 9928319
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我想要的是一个函数,给定数据和窗口大小将返回相同大小的数据表,并在每列上应用平均滑动窗口.换句话说 - 对于每个行条目i,它将找到坐标之间的坐标[i] -windsize和coords [i] + windsize并用该间隔内的值的平均值替换初始值(对于每列分别) .
速度是这里的主要问题.
这是我第一次接受这样的功能.
doSlidingWindow <- function(intensities, coords, windsize) {
windHalfSize <- ceiling(windsize/2)
### whole range inds
RANGE <- integer(max(coords)+windsize)
RANGE[coords] <- c(1:length(coords)[1])
### get indeces of rows falling in each window
COORDS <- as.list(coords)
WINDOWINDS <- sapply(COORDS, function(crds){ unique(RANGE[(crds-windHalfSize):
(crds+windHalfSize)]) })
### do windowing
wind_ints <- intensities
wind_ints[] <- 0
for(i in 1:length(coords)) {
wind_ints[i,] <- apply(as.matrix(intensities[WINDOWINDS[[i]],]), 2, mean)
}
return(wind_ints)
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
最后一个for循环之前的代码非常快,它为我提供了我需要为每个条目使用的索引列表.然而,一切都崩溃了,因为我需要研磨for循环一百万次,获取我的数据表的子集,并确保我有多行可以在apply中同时处理所有列.
我的第二种方法是将实际值粘贴在RANGE列表中,用零填充空白并从zoo包中进行rollmean,对每列重复.但这是多余的,因为rollmean将遍历所有间隙,我将只使用最终原始坐标的值.
任何帮助,使其更快,而不去C,将非常感激.
数据生成:
N <- 1e5 # rows
M <- 200 # columns
W <- 10 # window size
set.seed(1)
intensities <- matrix(rnorm(N*M), nrow=N, ncol=M)
coords <- 8000000 + sort(sample(1:(5*N), N))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
原始功能,我用于基准测试的微小修改:
doSlidingWindow <- function(intensities, coords, windsize) {
windHalfSize <- ceiling(windsize/2)
### whole range inds
RANGE <- integer(max(coords)+windsize)
RANGE[coords] <- c(1:length(coords)[1])
### get indices of rows falling in each window
### NOTE: Each elements of WINDOWINDS holds zero. Not a big problem though.
WINDOWINDS <- sapply(coords, function(crds) ret <- unique(RANGE[(crds-windHalfSize):(crds+windHalfSize)]))
### do windowing
wind_ints <- intensities
wind_ints[] <- 0
for(i in 1:length(coords)) {
# CORRECTION: When it's only one row in window there was a trouble
wind_ints[i,] <- apply(matrix(intensities[WINDOWINDS[[i]],], ncol=ncol(intensities)), 2, mean)
}
return(wind_ints)
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
可能的解决方案:
1)data.table
data.table众所周知,子集化速度很快,但这个页面(以及与滑动窗口相关的其他内容)表明情况并非如此.确实,data.table代码很优雅,但遗憾的是很慢:
require(data.table)
require(plyr)
dt <- data.table(coords, intensities)
setkey(dt, coords)
aaply(1:N, 1, function(i) dt[WINDOWINDS[[i]], sapply(.SD,mean), .SDcols=2:(M+1)])
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
2)foreach + doSNOW
基本例程易于并行运行,因此,我们可以从中受益:
require(doSNOW)
doSlidingWindow2 <- function(intensities, coords, windsize) {
NC <- 2 # number of nodes in cluster
cl <- makeCluster(rep("localhost", NC), type="SOCK")
registerDoSNOW(cl)
N <- ncol(intensities) # total number of columns
chunk <- ceiling(N/NC) # number of columns send to the single node
result <- foreach(i=1:NC, .combine=cbind, .export=c("doSlidingWindow")) %dopar% {
start <- (i-1)*chunk+1
end <- ifelse(i!=NC, i*chunk, N)
doSlidingWindow(intensities[,start:end], coords, windsize)
}
stopCluster(cl)
return (result)
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Benchmark在我的双核处理器上显示出显着的加速:
system.time(res <- doSlidingWindow(intensities, coords, W))
# user system elapsed
# 306.259 0.204 307.770
system.time(res2 <- doSlidingWindow2(intensities, coords, W))
# user system elapsed
# 1.377 1.364 177.223
all.equal(res, res2, check.attributes=FALSE)
# [1] TRUE
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
3)Rcpp
是的,我知道你问过" 不去C ".但是,请看一下.此代码内联且相当简单:
require(Rcpp)
require(inline)
doSlidingWindow3 <- cxxfunction(signature(intens="matrix", crds="numeric", wsize="numeric"), plugin="Rcpp", body='
#include <vector>
Rcpp::NumericMatrix intensities(intens);
const int N = intensities.nrow();
const int M = intensities.ncol();
Rcpp::NumericMatrix wind_ints(N, M);
std::vector<int> coords = as< std::vector<int> >(crds);
int windsize = ceil(as<double>(wsize)/2);
for(int i=0; i<N; i++){
// Simple search for window range (begin:end in coords)
// Assumed that coords are non-decreasing
int begin = (i-windsize)<0?0:(i-windsize);
while(coords[begin]<(coords[i]-windsize)) ++begin;
int end = (i+windsize)>(N-1)?(N-1):(i+windsize);
while(coords[end]>(coords[i]+windsize)) --end;
for(int j=0; j<M; j++){
double result = 0.0;
for(int k=begin; k<=end; k++){
result += intensities(k,j);
}
wind_ints(i,j) = result/(end-begin+1);
}
}
return wind_ints;
')
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
基准测试:
system.time(res <- doSlidingWindow(intensities, coords, W))
# user system elapsed
# 306.259 0.204 307.770
system.time(res3 <- doSlidingWindow3(intensities, coords, W))
# user system elapsed
# 0.328 0.020 0.351
all.equal(res, res3, check.attributes=FALSE)
# [1] TRUE
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我希望结果非常激励.虽然数据适合内存Rcpp版本非常快.说,有N <- 1e6,M <-100我得到:
user system elapsed
2.873 0.076 2.951
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
当然,在R开始使用交换之后,一切都会变慢.对于不适合内存的非常大的数据,您应该考虑sqldf,ff或bigmemory.