Python内存泄漏？

Question

我正在写一个似乎在泄漏内存的python扩展.我试图用valgrind找出问题的根源.

然而,根据valgrind,似乎python本身正在泄漏内存.使用以下简单脚本:

hello.py

  print "Hello World!"

并做

> valgrind --tool=memcheck python ./hello.py

(...)
==7937== ERROR SUMMARY: 580 errors from 34 contexts (suppressed: 21 from 1)
==7937== malloc/free: in use at exit: 721,878 bytes in 190 blocks.
==7937== malloc/free: 2,436 allocs, 2,246 frees, 1,863,631 bytes allocated.
==7937== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v
==7937== Use --track-origins=yes to see where uninitialised values come from
==7937== searching for pointers to 190 not-freed blocks.
==7937== checked 965,952 bytes.
==7937== 
==7937== LEAK SUMMARY:
==7937==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==7937==      possibly lost: 4,612 bytes in 13 blocks.
==7937==    still reachable: 717,266 bytes in 177 blocks.
==7937==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==7937== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory.

有没有人对这种行为有解释？python解释器真的泄漏了内存吗？

python开发人员使用什么工具来调试他们的内存泄漏？

Answer 1

Python源代码中有一个完整的README.valgrind,它解释了尝试使用Valgrind和Python的各种警告:

http://svn.python.org/projects/python/trunk/Misc/README.valgrind

Python uses its own small-object allocation scheme on top of malloc,
called PyMalloc.

Valgrind may show some unexpected results when PyMalloc is used.
Starting with Python 2.3, PyMalloc is used by default.  You can disable
PyMalloc when configuring python by adding the --without-pymalloc option.
If you disable PyMalloc, most of the information in this document and
the supplied suppressions file will not be useful.  As discussed above,
disabling PyMalloc can catch more problems.

If you use valgrind on a default build of Python,  you will see
many errors like:

        ==6399== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
        ==6399== at 0x4A9BDE7E: PyObject_Free (obmalloc.c:711)
        ==6399== by 0x4A9B8198: dictresize (dictobject.c:477)

These are expected and not a problem.