hai*_*jin 11 memory garbage-collection v8 node.js
我试图用一个什么都不服务器配置nodejs v8内存.我使用node-memwatch来获取堆差异.我在连接之前和连接之后收集堆信息.我使用了node-memwatch.我尝试了客户端的200个并发连接.
这是连接tore down后的gc跟踪.
任何人都可以帮助我理解:
为什么记忆在增加?连接崩溃后,服务器绝对什么都不做.它不应该假设总是随着收集的垃圾而下降吗?
2.那些分配失败是什么?我如何真正解释这里的痕迹?
15802 ms: Mark-sweep 8.9 (45.0) -> 8.1 (45.0) MB, 58 ms [allocation failure] [GC in old space forced by flags].
16144 ms: Mark-sweep 9.2 (45.0) -> 8.4 (45.0) MB, 53 ms [allocation failure] [GC in old space forced by flags].
16495 ms: Mark-sweep 9.5 (45.0) -> 8.7 (46.0) MB, 60 ms [allocation failure] [GC in old space forced by flags].
16837 ms: Mark-sweep 9.8 (46.0) -> 9.0 (46.0) MB, 56 ms [allocation failure] [GC in old space forced by flags].
17197 ms: Mark-sweep 10.1 (46.0) -> 9.4 (46.0) MB, 62 ms [allocation failure] [GC in old space forced by flags].
17905 ms: Mark-sweep 11.5 (46.0) -> 10.0 (47.0) MB, 74 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
18596 ms: Mark-sweep 12.2 (47.0) -> 10.7 (47.0) MB, 75 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
19315 ms: Mark-sweep 12.8 (47.0) -> 11.3 (48.0) MB, 83 ms [allocation failure] [GC in old space forced by flags].
20035 ms: Mark-sweep 13.4 (48.0) -> 12.0 (49.0) MB, 90 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
21487 ms: Mark-sweep 16.0 (49.0) -> 13.2 (50.0) MB, 96 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
22950 ms: Mark-sweep 17.3 (50.0) -> 14.5 (52.0) MB, 116 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
24376 ms: Mark-sweep 18.8 (52.0) -> 15.9 (53.0) MB, 114 ms [allocation failure] [GC in old space forced by flags].
25849 ms: Mark-sweep 19.9 (53.0) -> 17.2 (54.0) MB, 129 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
28773 ms: Mark-sweep 25.2 (54.0) -> 19.7 (57.0) MB, 149 ms [allocation failure] [GC in old space forced by flags].
31725 ms: Mark-sweep 27.7 (57.0) -> 22.2 (59.0) MB, 172 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
34678 ms: Mark-sweep 30.2 (59.0) -> 24.7 (61.0) MB, 190 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
44045 ms: Mark-sweep 28.4 (61.0) -> 25.8 (63.0) MB, 180 ms [idle notification] [GC in old space forced by flags].
44216 ms: Mark-sweep 25.8 (63.0) -> 25.8 (63.0) MB, 170 ms [idle notification] [GC in old space requested].
57471 ms: Mark-sweep 26.9 (63.0) -> 25.8 (62.0) MB, 167 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
57651 ms: Mark-sweep 26.8 (62.0) -> 25.5 (62.0) MB, 160 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
57828 ms: Mark-sweep 26.5 (62.0) -> 25.5 (62.0) MB, 159 ms [Runtime::PerformGC] [GC in old space forced by flags].
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
谢谢,
"分配失败"听起来非常引人注目,但并没有真正的失败.它只是意味着我们分配了这么多内存,现在是时候做一个GC来看看我们是否可以收集一些内存.
看起来你正在运行--gc-global标志("GC强制标记").这对于生产来说是一个坏主意,尽管在调试时缩小问题可能没什么问题.
我不知道为什么你的流程正在泄漏.您可能会发现堆分析器很有用.请参阅https://github.com/felixge/node-memory-leak-tutorial
根据代码:
PrintF("%s %.1f (%.1f) -> %.1f (%.1f) MB, ",
CollectorString(),
static_cast<double>(start_object_size_) / MB,
static_cast<double>(start_memory_size_) / MB,
SizeOfHeapObjects(),
end_memory_size_mb);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
每一行就是一次gc,当gc开始时,
start_object_size_ = heap_->SizeOfObjects();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在GC总结中:
PrintF("total_size_before=%" V8_PTR_PREFIX "d ", start_object_size_);
PrintF("total_size_after=%" V8_PTR_PREFIX "d ", heap_->SizeOfObjects());
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
至于为什么 start_object_size_ 在我的应用程序空闲时增加,我猜测可能在 gc 期间,某些对象被提升到旧空间并导致旧空间中的对象大小增加。
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
10399 次 |
| 最近记录: |