OCaml递归函数

pla*_*icz 2 recursion reduce ocaml functional-programming eval

我是OCaml的新手.我写了这段代码来减少代数表达式:

type expr =
    | Int of int
    | Float of float
    | Add of expr*expr
    | Sub of expr*expr
    | Mult of expr*expr
    | Div of expr*expr
    | Minus of expr

let rec eval expression = match expression with
    | Add (e1, e2) -> (eval e1) +. (eval e2)
    | Sub (e1,e2) -> (eval e1) -. (eval e2)
    | Mult (e1,e2) -> (eval e1) *. (eval e2)
    | Div (e1, e2) -> (eval e1) /. (eval e2)
    | Minus (e1) -> -.(eval e1)
    | Int i -> (float) i
    | Float f -> f

let rec simplify_expr e = match e with
| Add (e1,e2) -> if (eval e1) == 0.0 then simplify_expr e2 
                                    else if (eval e2) == 0.0 then simplify_expr e1 
                                    else Add (simplify_expr e1, simplify_expr e2)
| Mult(e1,e2) -> if (eval e1) == 1.0 then simplify_expr e2 
                                    else if (eval e2) == 1.0 then simplify_expr e1 
                                    else Mult (simplify_expr e1, simplify_expr e2)
| Sub (e1, e2) -> if (eval e1) == 0.0 then simplify_expr e2 
                                    else if (eval e2) == 0.0 then simplify_expr e1 
                                    else Sub (simplify_expr e1, simplify_expr e2)
| Div (e1, e2) -> if (eval e1) == 1.0 then simplify_expr e2 
                                    else if (eval e2) == 1.0 then simplify_expr e1 
                                    else Div (simplify_expr e1, simplify_expr e2)
| Int i -> e
| Minus e1 -> simplify_expr(e1)
| Float f -> e
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我用这种方式调用simplify_expr:

Expr.simplify_expr Expr.Mult (Expr.Int 4, Expr.Add (Expr.Int 1, Expr.Int 0));;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我得错了答案:

- : Expr.expr = Expr.Mult (Expr.Int 4, Expr.Add (Expr.Int 1, Expr.Int 0))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

下面我粘贴调用的堆栈.

Expr.simplify_expr <--
  Expr.Mult (Expr.Int 4, Expr.Add (Expr.Int 1, Expr.Int 0))
Expr.eval <-- Expr.Int 4
Expr.eval --> 4.
Expr.eval <-- Expr.Add (Expr.Int 1, Expr.Int 0)
Expr.eval <-- Expr.Int 0
Expr.eval --> 0.
Expr.eval <-- Expr.Int 1
Expr.eval --> 1.
Expr.eval --> 1.
Expr.simplify_expr <-- Expr.Add (Expr.Int 1, Expr.Int 0)
Expr.eval <-- Expr.Int 1
Expr.eval --> 1.
Expr.eval <-- Expr.Int 0
Expr.eval --> 0.
Expr.simplify_expr <-- Expr.Int 0
Expr.simplify_expr --> Expr.Int 0
Expr.simplify_expr <-- Expr.Int 1
Expr.simplify_expr --> Expr.Int 1
Expr.simplify_expr --> Expr.Add (Expr.Int 1, Expr.Int 0)
Expr.simplify_expr <-- Expr.Int 4
Expr.simplify_expr --> Expr.Int 4
Expr.simplify_expr -->
  Expr.Mult (Expr.Int 4, Expr.Add (Expr.Int 1, Expr.Int 0))
- : Expr.expr = Expr.Mult (Expr.Int 4, Expr.Add (Expr.Int 1, Expr.Int 0))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我不知道,为什么在使用1(第9行)返回eval后,使用Add调用simplify_expr.有人可以帮忙吗?

jro*_*uie 9

替换===.参见例如!!=在OCaml中有意义吗?.

不是问题,还要检查Sub,DivMinus的情况下simplify_expr:0 - e2是不是e21 / e2e2...