Scala中几个Seqs的懒惰笛卡尔积

Question

我实现了一个简单的方法来生成笛卡尔积,Seq如下所示:

object RichSeq {
  implicit def toRichSeq[T](s: Seq[T]) = new RichSeq[T](s)
}

class RichSeq[T](s: Seq[T]) {

  import RichSeq._

  def cartesian(ss: Seq[Seq[T]]): Seq[Seq[T]] = {

    ss.toList match {
      case Nil        => Seq(s)
      case s2 :: Nil  => {
        for (e <- s) yield s2.map(e2 => Seq(e, e2))
      }.flatten
      case s2 :: tail => {
        for (e <- s) yield s2.cartesian(tail).map(seq => e +: seq)
      }.flatten
    }
  }
}

显然,这个很慢,因为它一次计算整个产品.有人在Scala中为这个问题实现了一个懒惰的解决方案吗？

UPD

好的,所以我在笛卡尔积上实现了一个非常愚蠢但是工作的迭代器版本.在这里发布给未来的爱好者:

object RichSeq {
  implicit def toRichSeq[T](s: Seq[T]) = new RichSeq(s) 
}

class RichSeq[T](s: Seq[T]) {

  def lazyCartesian(ss: Seq[Seq[T]]): Iterator[Seq[T]] = new Iterator[Seq[T]] {

    private[this] val seqs = s +: ss

    private[this] var indexes = Array.fill(seqs.length)(0)

    private[this] val counts = Vector(seqs.map(_.length - 1): _*)

    private[this] var current = 0

    def next(): Seq[T] = {
      val buffer = ArrayBuffer.empty[T]
      if (current != 0) {
        throw new NoSuchElementException("no more elements to traverse")
      }
      val newIndexes = ArrayBuffer.empty[Int]
      var inside = 0
      for ((index, i) <- indexes.zipWithIndex) {
        buffer.append(seqs(i)(index))
        newIndexes.append(index)
        if ((0 to i).forall(ind => newIndexes(ind) == counts(ind))) {
          inside = inside + 1
        }
      }
      current = inside
      if (current < seqs.length) {
        for (i <- (0 to current).reverse) {
          if ((0 to i).forall(ind => newIndexes(ind) == counts(ind))) {
            newIndexes(i) = 0
          } else if (newIndexes(i) < counts(i)) {
            newIndexes(i) = newIndexes(i) + 1
          }
        }
        current = 0
        indexes = newIndexes.toArray
      }
      buffer.result()
    }

    def hasNext: Boolean = current != seqs.length
  }
}

Answer 1

这是我对给定问题的解决方案.注意,懒惰只是通过使用.view用于理解的"根集合"引起的.

scala> def combine[A](xs: Traversable[Traversable[A]]): Seq[Seq[A]] =
     |  xs.foldLeft(Seq(Seq.empty[A])){
     |    (x, y) => for (a <- x.view; b <- y) yield a :+ b }
combine: [A](xs: Traversable[Traversable[A]])Seq[Seq[A]]
scala> combine(Set(Set("a","b","c"), Set("1","2"), Set("S","T"))) foreach (println(_))
List(a, 1, S)
List(a, 1, T)
List(a, 2, S)
List(a, 2, T)
List(b, 1, S)
List(b, 1, T)
List(b, 2, S)
List(b, 2, T)
List(c, 1, S)
List(c, 1, T)
List(c, 2, S)
List(c, 2, T)

为了实现这一点,我从/sf/answers/316055001/中combine定义的函数开始,将函数传递给它.但是,这并没有直接起作用,因为该代码需要一个类型的函数.所以我只是调整了一下代码.(a, b) => (a, b)(A, A) => A