Dan*_*ton 22 monads haskell fold function-composition
我很困惑.我可以这样写:
import Control.Monad
main = print $ head $ (foldr (.) id [f, g]) [3]
where f = (1:)
g = undefined
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
而输出是1.这是有道理的,因为它减少到:
main = print $ head $ ((1:) . undefined . id) [3]
main = print $ head $ (1:) ((undefined . id) [3])
main = print $ head $ 1 : ((undefined . id) [3])
main = print $ 1
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,如果我使用模糊相似的monadic技术,它不会起作用:
import Control.Monad
main = print $ (foldr (<=<) return [f, g]) 3
where f = const Nothing
g = undefined
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这点击prelude.Undefined.这很奇怪,因为我希望它减少:
main = print $ ((const Nothing) <=< undefined <=< return) 3
main = print $ return 3 >>= undefined >>= (\_ -> Nothing)
main = print $ Nothing -- nope! instead, undefined makes this blow up
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,翻转组成的顺序:
import Control.Monad
main = print $ (foldr (>=>) return [f, g]) 3
where f = const Nothing
g = undefined
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
确实完成了预期的短路并产生Nothing.
main = print $ (const Nothing >=> undefined >=> return) 3
main = print $ (const Nothing 3) >>= undefined >>= return
main = print $ Nothing >>= undefined >>= return
main = print $ Nothing
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我想比较两种方法可能比较苹果和橙子,但你能解释一下这种差异吗?我认为这f <=< g是monadic类似物f . g,但它们显然不像我想象的那样类似.你能解释一下原因吗?
ham*_*mar 20
这取决于您正在使用哪个monad,以及如何(>>=)定义其运算符.
在的情况下Maybe,(>>=)是在它的第一个参数严格,如丹尼尔费说明.
以下是一些其他monad的一些结果.
> :set -XNoMonomorphismRestriction
> let foo = (const (return 42) <=< undefined <=< return) 3
> :t foo
foo :: (Num t, Monad m) => m t
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
身份:懒惰.
> Control.Monad.Identity.runIdentity foo
42
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
IO:严格.
> foo :: IO Integer
*** Exception: Prelude.undefined
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
读者:懒惰.
> Control.Monad.Reader.runReader foo "bar"
42
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
作家:既有懒惰又有严格的变体.
> Control.Monad.Writer.runWriter foo
(42,())
> Control.Monad.Writer.Strict.runWriter foo
*** Exception: Prelude.undefined
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
州:既有严格也有懒惰版本.
> Control.Monad.State.runState foo "bar"
(42,"*** Exception: Prelude.undefined
> Control.Monad.State.Strict.runState foo "bar"
*** Exception: Prelude.undefined
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Cont:严格.
> Control.Monad.Cont.runCont foo id
*** Exception: Prelude.undefined
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Dan*_*her 19
第Maybe一个参数中的绑定是严格的.
Just v >>= f = f v
Nothing >>= f = Nothing
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以,当你尝试
Just v >>= undefined >>= \_ -> Nothing
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
你打了
undefined v >>= \_ -> Nothing
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
并且实现需要找出是否undefined v是Nothing或Just something要查看使用哪个等式(>>=).
另一方面,
Nothing >>= undefined
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
确定结果而不查看第二个参数(>>=).