HashMap put 选择返回与该键关联的先前值
/**
* Associates the specified value with the specified key in this map.
* If the map previously contained a mapping for the key, the old
* value is replaced.
*
* @param key key with which the specified value is to be associated
* @param value value to be associated with the specified key
* @return the previous value associated with <tt>key</tt>, or
* <tt>null</tt> if there was no mapping for <tt>key</tt>.
* (A <tt>null</tt> return can also indicate that the map
* previously associated <tt>null</tt> with <tt>key</tt>.)
*/
public V put(K key, V value) {
return putVal(hash(key), key, value, false, true);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
而compute选择返回新值
/**
* Attempts to compute a mapping for the specified key and its current
* mapped value (or {@code null} if there is no current mapping). For
* example, to either create or append a {@code String} msg to a value
* mapping:
*
* <pre> {@code
* map.compute(key, (k, v) -> (v == null) ? msg : v.concat(msg))}</pre>
* (Method {@link #merge merge()} is often simpler to use for such purposes.)
*
* <p>If the function returns {@code null}, the mapping is removed (or
* remains absent if initially absent). If the function itself throws an
* (unchecked) exception, the exception is rethrown, and the current mapping
* is left unchanged.
*
* @implSpec
* The default implementation is equivalent to performing the following
* steps for this {@code map}, then returning the current value or
* {@code null} if absent:
*
* <pre> {@code
* V oldValue = map.get(key);
* V newValue = remappingFunction.apply(key, oldValue);
* if (oldValue != null ) {
* if (newValue != null)
* map.put(key, newValue);
* else
* map.remove(key);
* } else {
* if (newValue != null)
* map.put(key, newValue);
* else
* return null;
* }
* }</pre>
*
* <p>The default implementation makes no guarantees about synchronization
* or atomicity properties of this method. Any implementation providing
* atomicity guarantees must override this method and document its
* concurrency properties. In particular, all implementations of
* subinterface {@link java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentMap} must document
* whether the function is applied once atomically only if the value is not
* present.
*
* @param key key with which the specified value is to be associated
* @param remappingFunction the function to compute a value
* @return the new value associated with the specified key, or null if none
* @throws NullPointerException if the specified key is null and
* this map does not support null keys, or the
* remappingFunction is null
* @throws UnsupportedOperationException if the {@code put} operation
* is not supported by this map
* (<a href="{@docRoot}/java/util/Collection.html#optional-restrictions">optional</a>)
* @throws ClassCastException if the class of the specified key or value
* prevents it from being stored in this map
* (<a href="{@docRoot}/java/util/Collection.html#optional-restrictions">optional</a>)
* @since 1.8
*/
default V compute(K key,
BiFunction<? super K, ? super V, ? extends V> remappingFunction) {
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我很想知道return为 put 和compute 选择不同类型值的原因是什么。我知道这是一个主观问题,但想听听不同的意见 - 这样可以帮助理解它的逻辑意义。
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
109 次 |
| 最近记录: |