mik*_*ike 5 unit-testing shoulda ruby-on-rails-3
我有一个像这样的模块(但更复杂):
module Aliasable
def self.included(base)
base.has_many :aliases, :as => :aliasable
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我包含在几个模型中.目前我正在进行测试,我将制作另一个模块,我将其包含在测试用例中
module AliasableTest
def self.included(base)
base.class_exec do
should have_many(:aliases)
end
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
问题是如何单独测试该模块?或者以上方式是否足够好.似乎有可能有更好的方法来做到这一点.
首先,self.included它不是描述模块的好方法,并且class_exec不必要地使事情复杂化.相反,你应该extend ActiveSupport::Concern,如:
module Phoneable
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
included do
has_one :phone_number
validates_uniqueness_of :phone_number
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
您没有提到您正在使用的测试框架,但RSpec正好涵盖了这种情况.试试这个:
shared_examples_for "a Phoneable" do
it "should have a phone number" do
subject.should respond_to :phone_number
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
假设您的模型看起来像:
class Person class Business
include Phoneable include Phoneable
end end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后,在您的测试中,您可以:
describe Person do
it_behaves_like "a Phoneable" # reuse Phoneable tests
it "should have a full name" do
subject.full_name.should == "Bob Smith"
end
end
describe Business do
it_behaves_like "a Phoneable" # reuse Phoneable tests
it "should have a ten-digit tax ID" do
subject.tax_id.should == "123-456-7890"
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
1035 次 |
| 最近记录: |