Ant*_*ano 2 c precision fortran gfortran
我使用 gcc (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0
C代码是:
// Compile with:
// gcc -o little_c little.c
#include <stdio.h> // printf
void main(void) {
int n = 800;
float a[n][n], b[n][n], c[n][n];
int i, j, k;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < n; j++) {
a[i][j] = (float) (i+j);
b[i][j] = (float) (i-j);
}
}
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < n; j++) {
float t = (float) 0.0;
for (k = 0; k < n; k++)
t += a[i][k] * a[i][k] + b[k][j] * b[k][j];
//t += a[i][k] + b[k][j]; // If I comment the above line and uncomment this, the c and fortran reults are the same
c[i][j] = t;
}
}
printf("%f", c[n-1][n-1]); // prints the very last element
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Fortran 代码:
! Compile with:
! gfortran -o little_fort little.f90
program little
implicit none
integer, parameter :: n = 800
real :: a(n,n), b(n,n), c(n,n)
real :: t
integer :: i, j, k ! Counters
do i = 1, n
do j = 1, n
a(i,j) = real(i-1+j-1) ! Minus one, for it to be like the c version
b(i,j) = real(i-1-(j-1)) ! because in c, the index goes from 0 to n-1
end do
end do
do i = 1, n
do j = 1, n
t = 0.0
do k = 1, n
t = t + a(i,k) * a(i,k) + b(k,j) * b(k,j)
!t = t + a(i,k) + b(k,j) ! If I comment the above line and uncomment this, the c and fortran reults are the same
end do
c(i,j) = t
end do
end do
write (*,"(F20.4)") c(n,n) ! This is the same as c[n-1][n-1] in c
end program little
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
c 程序打印:1362136192.000000
Fortran 程序打印:1362137216.0000
如果我不将每个元素自身相乘,正如我在代码中的注释中所述,我会为两个版本的程序获得相同的值:
c 程序:639200.000000
Fortran 程序:639200.0000
为什么当我使用乘法时,c 和 Fortran 代码会产生不同的结果?。它是否必须与实数的不同实现?
The difference is due to the order of evaluation combined with the limited precision of the floating point type.
If you change the Fortran version to
t = t + (a(i,k) * a(i,k) + b(k,j) * b(k,j))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
i.e. add parenthesis around the terms with a and b, you get the same result for both languages. The C version already uses this order of evaluation due to the use of the += assignment operator.
As mentioned in the comments, this is expected behavior at the limits of the available precision.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
98 次 |
| 最近记录: |