Naw*_*waz 4 c++ lambda finally try-catch c++11
受到其他主题的启发,我编写了这个模拟finally
块的代码:
#include <cassert>
#include <iostream>
struct base { virtual ~base(){} };
template<typename TLambda>
struct exec : base
{
TLambda lambda;
exec(TLambda l) : lambda(l){}
~exec() { lambda(); }
};
class lambda{
base *pbase;
public:
template<typename TLambda>
lambda(TLambda l): pbase(new exec<TLambda>(l)){}
~lambda() { delete pbase; }
};
class A{
int a;
public:
void start(){
int a=1;
lambda finally = [&]{a=2; std::cout<<"finally executed";};
try{
assert(a==1);
//do stuff
}
catch(int){
//do stuff
}
}
};
int main() {
A a;
a.start();
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
输出(ideone):
finally executed
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
@Johannes似乎认为它不完全正确,并评论说:
如果编译器在复制初始化中没有删除临时文件,它可能会崩溃,因为它会使用相同的指针值删除两次
我想知道究竟是怎么回事.帮我理解问题:-)
编辑:
问题修复为:
class lambda{
base *pbase;
public:
template<typename TLambda>
lambda(TLambda l): pbase(new exec<TLambda>(l)){}
~lambda() { delete pbase; }
lambda(const lambda&)= delete; //disable copy ctor
lambda& operator=(const lambda&)= delete; //disable copy assignment
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后将其用作:
//direct initialization, no copy-initialization
lambda finally([&]{a=2; std::cout << "finally executed" << std::endl; });
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在这个初始化中:
lambda finally = [&]{a=2; std::cout<<"finally executed";};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
lambda
可以使用隐式定义的复制构造函数.这将只复制原始指针pbase
,然后将多次删除.
例如
$ g++ -std=c++0x -Wall -Wextra -pedantic -fno-elide-constructors lambdafun.cc
$ ./a.out
a.out: lambdafun.cc:29: void A::start(): Assertion `a==1' failed.
finally executedAborted (core dumped)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
实际上,你的断言触发掩盖了双重删除问题,但这证明了我突出显示的崩溃.
$ g++ -std=c++0x -Wall -Wextra -pedantic -fno-elide-constructors -DNDEBUG lambdafun.cc
$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
归档时间: |
|
查看次数: |
1274 次 |
最近记录: |