khr*_*hai 3 functional-programming lambda-calculus proof-of-correctness k-combinator s-combinator
我是lambda演算的新手,并努力证明以下内容.
SKK和II是等效的.
哪里
S = lambda xyz.xz(yz)K = lambda xy.x I = lambda xx
我尝试通过打开它来测试减少SKK,但无处可去,它变得凌乱.不要认为SKK可以在不扩展S,K的情况下进一步减少.
SKK
= (?xyz.xz(yz))KK
? ?z.Kz(Kz) (in two steps actually, for the two parameters)
Kz
= (?xy.x)z
? ?y.z
?z.Kz(Kz)
? ?z.(?y.z)(?y.z) (again, several steps)
? ?z.z
= I
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
(你应该能证明这一点II ? I)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
1825 次 |
| 最近记录: |