我有一个Python模块,其中包含一个while循环,该循环应该运行固定的时间。我通过在time.time()的输出中添加一个常量并运行直到time.time()大于该变量来完成此操作。这没有出现任何问题,但是在Cython中,同样的事情对我不起作用。现在,我越来越不准时机了。
只是一个最小的示例来说明这一点:
import time
cdef float wait_time = 3
def slow():
cdef float end_time = time.time() + wait_time
while time.time() < end_time:
pass
print("Done")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
44.2 µs ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
35.5 µs ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
35.5 µs ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
19.5 µs ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
35.5 µs ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
20.6 µs ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
20 µs ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
56 µs ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
1min 3s ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
32.9 µs ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
%timeit -r1 -n1 slow()
Done
1min 5s ± 0 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 1 run, 1 loop each)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
趋向于遵循的一般行为是,基本上没有等待,除了在运行该功能之前暂停了一会之后,在这种情况下,会有过多的等待。
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
61 次 |
| 最近记录: |