ket*_*eth 8 java hibernate multi-tenant spring-boot
我已经开始转换我现有的Spring Boot(1.5.4.RELEASE)应用程序以使用多租户功能.它是一个基于模式的多租户解决方案,基于mysql.正如下面提到的hibernate文档
https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/4.2/devguide/en-US/html/ch16.html
我已经实现了MultiTenantConnectionProvider和CurrentTenantIdentifierResolver接口,它工作正常.
package com.ifi.aws.tenant.config.hibernate;
import org.hibernate.HibernateException;
import org.hibernate.engine.jdbc.connections.spi.MultiTenantConnectionProvider;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
import com.ifi.aws.tenant.entity.TenantContext;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
@Component
public class MultiTenantConnectionProviderImpl implements MultiTenantConnectionProvider {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 6246085840652870138L;
@Autowired
private DataSource dataSource;
@Override
public Connection getAnyConnection() throws SQLException {
return dataSource.getConnection();
}
@Override
public void releaseAnyConnection(Connection connection) throws SQLException {
connection.close();
}
@Override
public Connection getConnection(String tenantIdentifier) throws SQLException {
final Connection connection = getAnyConnection();
try {
connection.createStatement().execute( "USE " + tenantIdentifier );
}
catch ( SQLException e ) {
throw new HibernateException(
"Could not alter JDBC connection to specified schema [" + tenantIdentifier + "]",
e
);
}
return connection;
}
@Override
public void releaseConnection(String tenantIdentifier, Connection connection) throws SQLException {
try {
connection.createStatement().execute( "USE " + TenantContext.DEFAULT_TENANT );
}
catch ( SQLException e ) {
throw new HibernateException(
"Could not alter JDBC connection to specified schema [" + tenantIdentifier + "]",
e
);
}
connection.close();
}
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes")
@Override
public boolean isUnwrappableAs(Class unwrapType) {
return false;
}
@Override
public <T> T unwrap(Class<T> unwrapType) {
return null;
}
@Override
public boolean supportsAggressiveRelease() {
return true;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
package com.ifi.aws.tenant.config.hibernate;
import org.hibernate.context.spi.CurrentTenantIdentifierResolver;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import com.ifi.aws.tenant.entity.TenantContext;
@Configuration
public class TenantIdentifierResolver implements CurrentTenantIdentifierResolver {
@Override
public String resolveCurrentTenantIdentifier() {
String tenantId = TenantContext.getTenantSchema();
//System.out.println("------------------ resolveCurrentTenantIdentifier = " + tenantId);
if (tenantId != null) {
return tenantId;
}
return TenantContext.DEFAULT_TENANT;
}
@Override
public boolean validateExistingCurrentSessions() {
return true;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后下面是我的hibernate配置
package com.ifi.aws.tenant.config.hibernate;
import org.hibernate.MultiTenancyStrategy;
import org.hibernate.cfg.Environment;
import org.hibernate.context.spi.CurrentTenantIdentifierResolver;
import
org.hibernate.engine.jdbc.connections.spi.MultiTenantConnectionProvider;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.orm.jpa.JpaProperties;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaVendorAdapter;
import org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean;
import org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaVendorAdapter;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
@Configuration
public class HibernateConfig {
@Autowired
private JpaProperties jpaProperties;
@Bean
public JpaVendorAdapter jpaVendorAdapter() {
return new HibernateJpaVendorAdapter();
}
@Bean
public LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean entityManagerFactory(DataSource dataSource,
MultiTenantConnectionProvider multiTenantConnectionProviderImpl,
CurrentTenantIdentifierResolver currentTenantIdentifierResolverImpl) {
Map<String, Object> properties = new HashMap<>();
properties.putAll(jpaProperties.getHibernateProperties(dataSource));
properties.put(Environment.MULTI_TENANT, MultiTenancyStrategy.SCHEMA);
properties.put(Environment.MULTI_TENANT_CONNECTION_PROVIDER, multiTenantConnectionProviderImpl);
properties.put(Environment.MULTI_TENANT_IDENTIFIER_RESOLVER, currentTenantIdentifierResolverImpl);
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean em = new LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean();
em.setDataSource(dataSource);
em.setPackagesToScan("com.ifi.aws");
em.setJpaVendorAdapter(jpaVendorAdapter());
em.setJpaPropertyMap(properties);
return em;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是时间系统崩溃时出现以下错误
Springboot Multi-tenant with MultiTenantConnectionProvider always throw org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.pool.PoolExhaustedException: [http-nio-8086-exec-2] Timeout: Pool empty. Unable to fetch a connection in 30 seconds, none available[size:100; busy:100; idle:0; lastwait:30000].
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我在这个网站上做了一些阅读,并在以下问题中找到了完全相同的问题.
Spring Boot:Apache derby pool为空.无法在30秒内获取连接 Tomcat连接池已被取消
他们建议的修复之一是添加以下配置
spring.datasource.tomcat.max-active=100
spring.datasource.tomcat.max-idle=8
spring.datasource.tomcat.min-idle=8
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但我仍然得到相同的错误,我调试代码,发现它在每次执行数据库调用后关闭连接.你们有什么想法吗?
昨天我发现API根本没有关闭任何连接.我写了一个简单的实用程序来检查连接状态,如下所示
@Autowired
private DataSource ds;
@Before("execution(* com.ifi.aws.*.dao.impl.springData.*.*(..))")
public void logBeforeConnection(JoinPoint jp) throws Throwable {
logDataSourceInfos("Before", jp);
}
@After("execution(* com.ifi.aws.*.dao.impl.springData.*.*(..)) ")
public void logAfterConnection(JoinPoint jp) throws Throwable {
logDataSourceInfos("After", jp);
}
public void logDataSourceInfos(final String time, final JoinPoint jp) {
final String method = String.format("%s:%s", jp.getTarget().getClass().getName(), jp.getSignature().getName());
logger.debug("--------------------------------------------------------------------------");
logger.debug(String.format("%s %s: number of connections in use by the application (active): %d.", time, method, ds.getNumActive()));
logger.debug(String.format("%s %s: the number of established but idle connections: %d.", time, method, ds.getNumIdle()));
logger.debug(String.format("%s %s: number of threads waiting for a connection: %d.", time, method, ds.getWaitCount()));
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
}
其中显示了活动连接的持续增长.
Before com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: number of connections in use by the application (active): 21.
Before com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: the number of established but idle connections: 0.
Before com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: number of threads waiting for a connection: 0
-----------------
After com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: number of connections in use by the application (active): 21.
After com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: the number of established but idle connections: 0.
After com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: number of threads waiting for a connection: 0.
o.h.e.t.i.TransactionImpl : committing
-------------------
Before com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: number of connections in use by the application (active): 21.
Before com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: the number of established but idle connections: 0.
Before com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: number of threads waiting for a connection: 0
-----------------
After com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: number of connections in use by the application (active): 22.
After com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: the number of established but idle connections: 0.
After com.sun.proxy.$Proxy127:findOne: number of threads waiting for a connection: 0.
o.h.e.t.i.TransactionImpl : committing
-------------------
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然而,它在我的本地环境中完全正常,并且它正确地关闭了连接.我的测试环境部署在AWS t2 windows实例中,此API部署为Spring Boot jar文件,其中MYSQL服务器安装在同一t2实例中.我能看到的唯一区别是OPeration系统版本,可能是一些MYSQL服务器配置
编辑
我能够按照@ xerx593的说明解决问题
问题是supportsAggressiveRelease = true,我按照@ xerx593的建议将其更改为false.但是,我仍然想知道它如何在我的本地环境中工作,而不是在测试环境中.根据hibernate文档,它说"这个连接提供程序是否支持积极释放JDBC连接并在以后重新获取这些连接(如果需要)?".测试环境和本地环境都具有相同的配置,是否可以是操作系统版本或mysql配置的结果?
谢谢,Kelum
通过“暴力破解”,我们发现问题出在标志中supportsAggressiveRelease,当设置该标志时(= true),在 DEV 环境中没有显示任何问题,但会导致您的 AWS 实例出现问题。
@Override
public boolean supportsAggressiveRelease() {
return false;//!
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为什么这个环境不支持“积极发布”,在于您环境的配置/性质......
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
333 次 |
| 最近记录: |