Dispose()如何知道它是因为异常而调用的?

Ily*_*gan 8 c# nhibernate exception-handling data-access-layer unit-of-work

我想编写一个简单的工作类单元,其行为如下:

using (var unitOfWork = new UnitOfWork())
{
   // Call the data access module and don't worry about transactions.
   // Let the Unit of Work open a session, begin a transaction and then commit it.
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这是我到目前为止(如果您认为我的设计错误,欢迎任何评论):

class UnitOfWork : IDisposable
{
   ISession _session;
   ITransation _transaction;
   .
   .
   .
   void Dispose()
   {
      _transaction.Commit();
      _session.Dispose();
   }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我想要做的是回滚事务,以防数据访问代码抛出一些异常.所以该Dispose()方法看起来像:

   void Dispose()
   {
      if (Dispose was called because an exception was thrown) 
      {
         _transaction.Commit();
      }
      else
      {
         _transaction.RollBack();
      }
      _session.Dispose();
   }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

是否有意义?如果是这样,怎么办呢?

Shi*_*mar 6

"Dispose()"应该与事务提交或回滚无关.您应该在Dispose()方法中处理事务.更改Dispose()方法的语义只会为您和使用您的类的其他任何人带来混乱.

事务的Commit()和RollBack()方法与Dispose()方法没有任何关系,因为这两个方法和Dispose()之间没有关联,因为无论最终结果如何,都必须处理事务.

这是用于连接和事务的正确模式.注意Roolback(0与异常有关(而不是处置)

connection.Open();
var trasnaction = null;
try
{
  transaction = connection.BeginTransaction(); 
  ///Do Some work
  transaction.Commit();
}
catch
{
  transaction.Rollback();
}
finally
{
  if (transaction != null)
    transaction.Dispose();
  connection.Close();
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

因此,使用Commit(),Roolback()和Dispose()方法在UnitOfWork中模仿这种模式.


Ily*_*gan 1

毕竟,我实现了一个方法,所有操作都应该通过该方法执行:

class UnitOfWork : IDisposable
{
   ...
   public void DoInTransaction(Action<ISession> method)
   {
       Open session, begin transaction, call method, and then commit. Roll back if there was an exception.
   }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)