Who*_*ami 1 python machine-learning neural-network mnist keras
我一直在尝试使用简单的 mnist 示例。对不起,如果问题是非常基本的问题。
from keras.datasets import mnist
from keras.layers import Input, Conv2D, Dense
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.utils import np_utils
def myModel():
model= Sequential()
layer1 = Dense(1024, input_shape=(784,), activation='relu')
layer2 = Dense(512, activation='relu')
layer3 = Dense(10, activation='softmax')
model.add (layer1)
model.add (layer2)
model.add(layer3)
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam')
return model
if __name__ == '__main__':
print "Inside the main function "
model = myModel()
(trainX, trainY), (testX, testY) = mnist.load_data()
print ("TrainX shape is ", trainX.shape)
trainX = trainX.reshape(trainX.shape[0], trainX.shape[1] * trainX.shape[2])
trainY = np_utils.to_categorical(trainY, 10)
model.fit(trainX, trainY, batch_size=200, epochs=1)
print ("Let's predict now..")
print ("Shae of x and shape of 100" , trainX.shape, trainX[10].shape)
result = model.predict(trainX[100].reshape(1,784 ))
print result
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.subplot(2,2,1)
plt.imshow(trainX[1100].reshape(28,28))
plt.show()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
最后一层的输出值为
[[0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0.]]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我该如何解释这个结果?这不是结果的概率分布吗?。如果不是我怎么得到相同的?
从理论上讲,应该有什么奇怪的与像一个概率分布[0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0.],即p[5]=1与p[k]=0所有其他k......所有参赛作品都在[0, 1]和他们总结到1.0。
在实践中,您犯了未规范化输入数据的错误trainX(Keras MNIST MLP 示例应该是您的指南);添加
trainX = trainX.astype('float32')
trainX /= 255
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在拟合模型之前,我们得到(请注意,与您自己的试验相比,拟合过程中的损失会有多小):
result = model.predict(trainX[100].reshape(1,784 ))
# result:
array([[6.99907425e-04, 7.85773620e-04, 1.73144764e-03, 9.31426825e-04,
5.75593032e-04, 9.49266493e-01, 1.22108115e-02, 1.03891856e-04,
3.18745896e-02, 1.82012399e-03]], dtype=float32)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这是一个好结果吗?
np.argmax(result)
# 5
np.argmax(trainY[100]) # true label
# 5
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
看来确实是...