在单元测试中模拟打开(file_name)

Kar*_*tik 24 python unit-testing mox

我有一个源代码打开一个csv文件并设置一个标头值关联.源代码如下:

def ParseCsvFile(source): 
  """Parse the csv file. 
  Args: 
    source: file to be parsed

  Returns: the list of dictionary entities; each dictionary contains
             attribute to value mapping or its equivalent. 
  """ 
  global rack_file 
  rack_type_file = None 
  try: 
    rack_file = source 
    rack_type_file = open(rack_file)  # Need to mock this line.
    headers = rack_type_file.readline().split(',') 
    length = len(headers) 
    reader = csv.reader(rack_type_file, delimiter=',') 
    attributes_list=[] # list of dictionaries. 
    for line in reader: 
      # More process to happeng. Converting the rack name to sequence. 
      attributes_list.append(dict((headers[i],
                                   line[i]) for i in range(length))) 
    return attributes_list 
  except IOError, (errno, strerror): 
    logging.error("I/O error(%s): %s" % (errno, strerror)) 
  except IndexError, (errno, strerror): 
    logging.error('Index Error(%s), %s' %(errno, strerror)) 
  finally: 
    rack_type_file.close() 
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我试图嘲笑以下声明

rack_type_file = open(rack_file) 
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我如何模拟open(...)函数?

mac*_*mac 22

这无疑是一个古老的问题,因此有些答案已经过时了.

在当前版本的mock库中,有一个便利功能,正是为此目的而设计的.以下是它的工作原理:

>>> from mock import mock_open
>>> m = mock_open()
>>> with patch('__main__.open', m, create=True):
...     with open('foo', 'w') as h:
...         h.write('some stuff')
...
>>> m.mock_calls
[call('foo', 'w'),
 call().__enter__(),
 call().write('some stuff'),
 call().__exit__(None, None, None)]
>>> m.assert_called_once_with('foo', 'w')
>>> handle = m()
>>> handle.write.assert_called_once_with('some stuff')
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

文档在这里.

  • 顺便说一下,由于mock现在是标准库的一部分,你现在可以将其导入为:`from unittest.mock import mock_open`. (3认同)

Luk*_*tas 13

要使用mox使用__builtin__模块打开内置函数:

import __builtin__ # unlike __builtins__ this must be imported
m = mox.Mox()
m.StubOutWithMock(__builtin__, 'open')
open('ftphelp.yml', 'rb').AndReturn(StringIO("fake file content"))     
m.ReplayAll()
# call the code you want to test that calls `open`
m.VerifyAll()
m.UnsetStubs()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

注意,__builtins__并不总是一个模块,它可以是dict类型,请使用__builtin__(没有"s")模块来引用系统内置方法.

有关__builtin__模块的更多信息:http://docs.python.org/library/ builtin .html


Spi*_*nim 10

根据具体情况,我喜欢这两种方式.

如果您的单元测试将直接调用ParseCsvFile,我会向ParseCsvFile添加一个新的kwarg:

def ParseCsvFile(source, open=open): 
    # ...
    rack_type_file = open(rack_file)  # Need to mock this line.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

然后您的单元测试可以传递不同的open_func以完成模拟.

如果你的单元测试调用一些其他函数,而这些函数又调用ParseCsvFile,那么为了测试而传递open_func是很难看的.在那种情况下,我会使用模拟模块.这允许您按名称更改函数并将其替换为Mock对象.

# code.py
def open_func(name):
    return open(name)

def ParseCsvFile(source):
    # ...
    rack_type_file = open_func(rack_file)  # Need to mock this line.

# test.py
import unittest
import mock
from StringIO import StringIO

@mock.patch('code.open_func')
class ParseCsvTest(unittest.TestCase):
    def test_parse(self, open_mock):
        open_mock.return_value = StringIO("my,example,input")
        # ...
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)


wie*_*iks 5

使用装饰器(Python3)很简单:

def my_method():
    with open(file="/1.txt", mode='r', encoding='utf-8') as file:
        return file.read().strip()


@mock.patch("builtins.open", create=True)
def test_my_method(mock_open):
    mock_open.side_effect = [
        mock.mock_open(read_data="A").return_value
    ]

    resA = my_method()
    assert resA == "A"

    mock_open.mock_calls ==  [mock.call(file="/1.txt", mode='r', encoding='utf-8')]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)