Kin*_*n84 2 java traversal arraylist immutability
我们有一个简单的自定义对象:
public class CustomObject {
public CustomObject(int myIntNumber, String myString) {
this.myIntNumber = myIntNumber ;
this.myString = myString;
}
private int myIntNumber;
private String myString;
public void setMyIntNumber(int myIntNumber) {
this.myIntNumber = myIntNumber;
}
public int getMyIntNumber() {
return myIntNumber;
}
public void setMyString(String myString) {
this.myString = myString;
}
public String getMyString() {
return myString;
}
public String toString() {
return "CustomObject [" + String.valueOf(myIntNumber) + ", "+ myString+"]" ;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
并且,我们尝试使用for ... each循环修改此类对象的ArrayList.当无法以这种方式修改String对象或Integer对象的ArrayList时,为什么列表中的对象会被修改?
我的测试代码:
import java.util.ArrayList;
public class TestTraveringListModification {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ArrayList<String> sList = new ArrayList<String>();
sList.add("String a");
sList.add("String b");
sList.add("C");
sList.add("D");
sList.add("String f");
sList.add("String e");
System.out.println("Before: "+sList);
for (String s : sList) {
s="asdf" ;
}
System.out.println("After: "+ sList);
ArrayList<CustomObject> objL = new ArrayList<CustomObject> () ;
objL.add(new CustomObject (1, "test") );
objL.add(new CustomObject (2, "jim") );
objL.add(new CustomObject (20, "dec") );
objL.add(new CustomObject (60, "what") );
System.out.println("before: "+ objL );
for(CustomObject co : objL ){
co.setMyIntNumber(-1);
co.setMyString("modified String");
}
System.out.println("after: "+objL);
ArrayList<Integer> numList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
numList.add(1);
numList.add(3);
numList.add(5);
numList.add(67);
numList.add(9598);
System.out.println("before: "+ numList);
for (Integer i : numList){
i = 8;
}
System.out.println("after: "+ numList);
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
运行它将产生以下输出:
Before: [String a, String b, C, D, String f, String e]
After: [String a, String b, C, D, String f, String e]
before: [CustomObject [1, test], CustomObject [2, jim], CustomObject [20, dec], CustomObject [60, what]]
after: [CustomObject [-1, modified String], CustomObject [-1, modified String], CustomObject [-1, modified String], CustomObject [-1, modified String]]
before: [1, 3, 5, 67, 9598]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
项目清单
after: [1, 3, 5, 67, 9598]
那么,为什么我可以修改objL而不是sList或numList?
因为重新分配和变异是两回事.
s = "asdf"会改变所指的s内容.它曾经包含对成员的引用sList,现在它指的是"asdf".这一变化与该成员无关sList.
与同类i和numList,虽然不是完全完全相同.numList包含Integer对象,从autoboxed 1,3,5... for将分配Integer对象的值i.如果您随后将值更改i为(autoboxed)Integer(8),则它也不会影响numList任何值.
然而,有了co和objL,你做了一件非常不同的事情.您没有重新分配co给另一个对象(不会影响对象objL),而是选择调用方法co,然后恰好改变它们的状态.请注意,这里您没有修改objL,您正在修改它包含的对象.
关键的见解是i,co并且s不是相应列表的元素.它们包含的值是可能是数组中的元素(但再次autounboxing的情况下,这也太不成立).
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
97 次 |
| 最近记录: |