我想有一个允许添加的防锈功能u32(u64,u128)类型的i32(i64,i128)类型,而检查溢出.
我的实施:
/// Add u32 to i32. In case of an overflow, return None.
fn checked_add_i32_u32(a: i32, b: u32) -> Option<i32> {
let b_half = (b / 2) as i32;
let b_rem = (b % 2) as i32;
Some(a.checked_add(b_half)?.checked_add(b_half)?
.checked_add(b_rem)?)
}
/// Add u64 to i64. In case of an overflow, return None.
fn checked_add_i64_u64(a: i64, b: u64) -> Option<i64> {
let b_half = (b / 2) as i64;
let b_rem = (b % 2) as i64;
Some(a.checked_add(b_half)?.checked_add(b_half)?
.checked_add(b_rem)?)
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我还有另外一个类似的u128和i128.我觉得我在重复自己.我对这些功能的测试看起来非常相似.
有没有办法可以重构我的代码并只改为一个函数?我不确定如何概括u32和i32(或u64和i64,u128和i128)之间的关系.
你可以使用宏:
trait CustomAdd: Copy {
type Unsigned;
fn my_checked_add(self, b: Self::Unsigned) -> Option<Self>;
}
macro_rules! impl_custom_add {
( $i:ty, $u:ty ) => {
impl CustomAdd for $i {
type Unsigned = $u;
fn my_checked_add(self, b: $u) -> Option<$i> {
let b_half = (b / 2) as $i;
let b_rem = (b % 2) as $i;
Some(self.checked_add(b_half)?.checked_add(b_half)?
.checked_add(b_rem)?)
}
}
}
}
impl_custom_add!(i32, u32);
impl_custom_add!(i64, u64);
// etc.
#[test]
fn tests() {
assert_eq!(123.my_checked_add(10_u32), Some(133));
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
196 次 |
| 最近记录: |