[更新]
malloc().很抱歉没有这么清楚.[更新++]我可能会接受下面的答案之一.但是,我忘了说,我们的枚举是非连续的,并且范围很广,这可以有所作为
intertubes和这个网站充斥着要求从枚举中获取文本的问题.
我找不到一个规范的方法来做这个(并且会接受一个作为这个问题的答案),所以让我们看看我们是否可以在我们之间拼凑一个.
在我们的代码中,我们有多个结构数组,包含枚举对应和相应的字符串.
问题是字符串具有不同的长度,因此我们为每个字符串编写一个查找函数,用于在结构数组上循环,尝试匹配枚举并在找到匹配时返回相应的文本.
让我们采取以下两个人为的例子:
// +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
typedef enum
{
north,
south,
east,
west
} E_directions;
struct direction_datum
{
E_directions direction;
char direction_name[6];
};
struct direction_datum direction_data[] =
{
{north, "north"},
{south, "south"},
{east, "east"},
{west, "west"},
};
// +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
typedef enum
{
hearts,
spades,
diamonds,
clubs,
} E_suits;
struct suit_datum
{
E_suits suit;
char suit_name[9];
};
struct suit_datum suit_data[] =
{
{hearts, "hearts"},
{spades, "spades"},
{diamonds, "diamonds",},
{clubs, "clubs"},
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
除了字符串长度,它们是相似/相同的,因此,理论上,我们应该能够编写泛型函数来循环遍历direction_data或suit_data给定索引并返回相应的文本.
我正在考虑这样的事情 - 但是它不起作用(结构中的枚举值似乎总是为零,所以显然我的指针算法是关闭的).
我做错了什么?
char *Get_text_from_enum(int enum_value,
void *array,
unsigned int array_length,
unsigned int size_of_array_entry)
{
unsigned int i;
unsigned int offset;
for (i = 0; i < array_length; i++)
{
offset = i * size_of_array_entry;
if ((int) * ((int *) (array+ offset)) == enum_value)
return (char *) (array + offset + sizeof(int));
}
return NULL;
}
printf("Expect south, got %s\n",
Get_text_from_enum(south,
direction_data,
ARRAY_LENGTH(direction_data),
sizeof(direction_data[0])));
printf("Expect diamonds, got %s\n",
Get_text_from_enum(diamonds,
suit_data,
ARRAY_LENGTH(suit_data),
sizeof(suit_data[0])));
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
有两种"规范"方法可以做到这一点.一个是可读的,一个避免代码重复.
可读的方式
"可读方式"是我推荐的.它使用相应的查找表构建枚举,其中枚举常量与查找表索引匹配:
typedef enum
{
north,
south,
east,
west,
directions_n // only used to keep track of the amount of enum constants
} direction_t;
const char* STR_DIRECTION [] = // let array size be based on number of items
{
"north",
"south",
"east",
"west"
};
#define ARRAY_ITEMS(array) (sizeof(array) / sizeof(*array))
...
// verify integrity of enum and look-up table both:
_Static_assert(directions_n == ARRAY_ITEMS(STR_DIRECTION),
"direction_t does not match STR_DIRECTION");
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果你愿意,你仍然可以有一个基于此的结构:
typedef struct
{
direction_t dir;
const char* str;
} dir_struct_t;
const dir_struct_t DIRS [directions_n] =
{ // use designated initializers to guarantee data integrity even if item order is changed:
[north] = {north, STR_DIRECTION[north]},
[south] = {south, STR_DIRECTION[south]},
[east] = {east, STR_DIRECTION[east]},
[west] = {west, STR_DIRECTION[west]}
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
没有代码重复的方式
另一种选择是使用所谓的"X-macros",除了作为最后的手段之外,它并不是真正推荐的,因为它们往往使代码严重不可读,特别是那些没有在这些宏上使用的代码.
此代码等同于上面的示例:
#define DIRECTION_LIST \
X(north), \
X(south), \
X(east), \
X(west), // trailing commma important here! (and ok in enums since C99)
typedef enum
{
#define X(dir) dir
DIRECTION_LIST
#undef X
directions_n // only used to keep track of the amount of enum constants
} direction_t;
typedef struct
{
direction_t dir;
const char* str;
} dir_struct_t;
const dir_struct_t DIRS [directions_n] =
{
#define X(dir) {dir, #dir}
DIRECTION_LIST
#undef X
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这个宏版本摆脱了显式字符串查找表.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
604 次 |
| 最近记录: |