Tim*_*Tim 6 scala dataframe apache-spark spark-dataframe
我在Spark中有数据框.看起来像这样:
+-------+----------+-------+
| value| group| ts|
+-------+----------+-------+
| A| X| 1|
| B| X| 2|
| B| X| 3|
| D| X| 4|
| E| X| 5|
| A| Y| 1|
| C| Y| 2|
+-------+----------+-------+
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Endgoal:我想找到有多少序列A-B-E(一个序列只是后续行的列表).增加的约束条件是序列的后续部分可以n分开最大行.让我们考虑这个例子n是2.
考虑组X.在这种情况下,恰好有1 和D之间(忽略多个连续的s).这意味着并且相隔1行,因此存在序列BEBBEA-B-E
我曾考虑使用collect_list(),创建一个字符串(如DNA)和使用正则表达式的子字符串搜索.但我想知道是否有更优雅的分布式方式,也许使用窗口函数?
编辑:
请注意,提供的数据框只是一个示例.真实的数据帧(以及组)可以是任意长的.
编辑回答@Tim的评论+修复"AABE"类型的模式
是的,使用窗口功能有帮助,但我创建了id一个有序:
val df = List(
(1,"A","X",1),
(2,"B","X",2),
(3,"B","X",3),
(4,"D","X",4),
(5,"E","X",5),
(6,"A","Y",1),
(7,"C","Y",2)
).toDF("id","value","group","ts")
import org.apache.spark.sql.expressions.Window
val w = Window.partitionBy('group).orderBy('id)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后lag将收集所需的内容,但是需要一个函数来生成Column表达式(注意拆分以消除"AABE"的重复计数.警告:这会拒绝"ABAEXX"类型的模式):
def createSeq(m:Int) = split(
concat(
(1 to 2*m)
.map(i => coalesce(lag('value,-i).over(w),lit("")))
:_*),"A")(0)
val m=2
val tmp = df
.withColumn("seq",createSeq(m))
+---+-----+-----+---+----+
| id|value|group| ts| seq|
+---+-----+-----+---+----+
| 6| A| Y| 1| C|
| 7| C| Y| 2| |
| 1| A| X| 1|BBDE|
| 2| B| X| 2| BDE|
| 3| B| X| 3| DE|
| 4| D| X| 4| E|
| 5| E| X| 5| |
+---+-----+-----+---+----+
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
由于ColumnAPI中可用的集合函数很少,因此使用UDF可以更容易地避免使用正则表达式
def patternInSeq(m: Int) = udf((str: String) => {
var notFound = str
.split("B")
.filter(_.contains("E"))
.filter(_.indexOf("E") <= m)
.isEmpty
!notFound
})
val res = tmp
.filter(('value === "A") && (locate("B",'seq) > 0))
.filter(locate("B",'seq) <= m && (locate("E",'seq) > 1))
.filter(patternInSeq(m)('seq))
.groupBy('group)
.count
res.show
+-----+-----+
|group|count|
+-----+-----+
| X| 1|
+-----+-----+
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果你想推广更长的字母序列,那么问题必须推广.这可能是微不足道的,但在这种情况下,应拒绝类型("ABAE")的模式(见注释).因此,最简单的推广方法是在下面的实现中使用成对规则(我添加了一个组"Z"来说明这个算法的行为)
val df = List(
(1,"A","X",1),
(2,"B","X",2),
(3,"B","X",3),
(4,"D","X",4),
(5,"E","X",5),
(6,"A","Y",1),
(7,"C","Y",2),
( 8,"A","Z",1),
( 9,"B","Z",2),
(10,"D","Z",3),
(11,"B","Z",4),
(12,"E","Z",5)
).toDF("id","value","group","ts")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
首先,我们定义一对的逻辑
import org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrame
def createSeq(m:Int) = array((0 to 2*m).map(i => coalesce(lag('value,-i).over(w),lit(""))):_*)
def filterPairUdf(m: Int, t: (String,String)) = udf((ar: Array[String]) => {
val (a,b) = t
val foundAt = ar
.dropWhile(_ != a)
.takeWhile(_ != a)
.indexOf(b)
foundAt != -1 && foundAt <= m
})
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后我们定义一个应用这个逻辑的函数迭代地应用于数据帧
def filterSeq(seq: List[String], m: Int)(df: DataFrame): DataFrame = {
var a = seq(0)
seq.tail.foldLeft(df){(df: DataFrame, b: String) => {
val res = df.filter(filterPairUdf(m,(a,b))('seq))
a = b
res
}}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
由于我们首先对从第一个字符开始的序列进行过滤,因此获得了简化和优化
val m = 2
val tmp = df
.filter('value === "A") // reduce problem
.withColumn("seq",createSeq(m))
scala> tmp.show()
+---+-----+-----+---+---------------+
| id|value|group| ts| seq|
+---+-----+-----+---+---------------+
| 6| A| Y| 1| [A, C, , , ]|
| 8| A| Z| 1|[A, B, D, B, E]|
| 1| A| X| 1|[A, B, B, D, E]|
+---+-----+-----+---+---------------+
val res = tmp.transform(filterSeq(List("A","B","E"),m))
scala> res.show()
+---+-----+-----+---+---------------+
| id|value|group| ts| seq|
+---+-----+-----+---+---------------+
| 1| A| X| 1|[A, B, B, D, E]|
+---+-----+-----+---+---------------+
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
(transform是一种简单的糖涂层DataFrame => DataFrame转化)
res
.groupBy('group)
.count
.show
+-----+-----+
|group|count|
+-----+-----+
| X| 1|
+-----+-----+
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
正如我所说,在扫描序列时有不同的方法来概括"重置规则",但是这个例子有望帮助实现更复杂的序列.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
10414 次 |
| 最近记录: |