Abe*_*bel 4 singleton f# sequence seq
更新:我为此创建了一个UserVoice请求:展开Seq的基数函数.
我需要功能Seq.exactlyOne,但有Some/None语义.换句话说,我需要Seq.head,或者,如果序列为空或包含多个项目,我什么都不需要.使用Seq.exactlyOne会抛出这种情况.
我不认为有一种内置的方式来获得这个(虽然它听起来如此微不足道,以至于人们会期望有一个对应物Seq.singleton).我想出了这个,但感觉很复杂:
let trySingleton sq =
match Seq.isEmpty sq with
| true -> None
| false ->
match sq |> Seq.indexed |> Seq.tryFind (fst >> ((=) 1)) with
| Some _ -> None
| None -> Seq.exactlyOne sq |> Some
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
得到:
> trySingleton [|1;2;3|];;
val it : int option = None
> trySingleton Seq.empty<int>;;
val it : int option = None
> trySingleton [|1|];;
val it : int option = Some 1
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
是否有更简单甚至是内置的方式?我可以尝试/赶上Seq.exactlyOne,但这是围绕异常构建业务逻辑,我宁愿不(并且它很昂贵).
更新:
我不知道该Seq.tryItem功能,这将使这更简单:
let trySingleton sq =
match sq |> Seq.tryItem 1 with
| Some _ -> None
| None -> Seq.tryHead sq
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
(更好,但它仍然感觉相当尴尬)
为什么不通过强制处理枚举器来解决问题呢?
let trySingleton' (xs : seq<_>) =
use en = xs.GetEnumerator()
if en.MoveNext() then
let res = en.Current
if en.MoveNext() then None
else Some res
else None
trySingleton' Seq.empty<int> // None
trySingleton' [1] // Some 1
trySingleton' [1;2] // None
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)