我想做这样的事情(非常简化):
((1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), (6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)).zipped map (_ + _)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
忽略整数的实际值(尽管重要的是这些是6元组,实际上:)).本质上,我想在一个维持Map[String, (Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int)]现有元素更新时间的函数中定期使用它.
事实上,Scala向我吐了出来:
<console>:6: error: could not find implicit value for parameter w1: ((Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int)) => scala.collection.TraversableLike[El1,Repr1]
((1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), (6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)).zipped
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果我使用Seqs而不是元组,一切正常,但我想在类型系统中强制执行6(我可能type Record = (Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int)很快就会做一个快速重构).
任何人都可以提供一些关于我做错的建议/为什么Scala不会处理上面的代码?我认为如果我使用2或3-arity元组,看看Scala定义Tuple2和Tuple3s(我知道在任意n-arity中缩放元组函数很困难),它可能会有效,但我得到了同样的错误.
提前感谢您提供的任何帮助:).
您只想映射具有相同类型的元组 - 否则映射没有意义 - 但是Tuple在其类型签名中不包含它.但是如果你愿意做一些工作,你可以设置它,以便元组以你要求的方式工作:
基础:
class TupTup6[A,B](a: (A,A,A,A,A,A), b: (B,B,B,B,B,B)) {
def op[C](f:(A,B)=>C) = ( f(a._1,b._1), f(a._2,b._2), f(a._3,b._3),
f(a._4,b._4), f(a._5,b._5), f(a._6,b._6) )
}
implicit def enable_tuptup6[A,B](ab: ((A,A,A,A,A,A),(B,B,B,B,B,B))) = {
new TupTup6(ab._1,ab._2)
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
用法:
scala> ((1,2,3,4,5,6) , (6,5,4,3,2,1)) op { _ + _ }
res0: (Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int) = (7,7,7,7,7,7)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我收到了这个小灵感.
class TupleZipper[T <: Product](t1: T) {
private def listify(p: Product) = p.productIterator.toList
def zipWith(t2: T) = (listify(t1), listify(t2)).zipped
}
implicit def mkZipper[T <: Product](t1: T) = new TupleZipper(t1)
// ha ha, it's arity magic
scala> ((1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)) zipWith ((6, 5, 4, 3, 2))
<console>:8: error: type mismatch;
found : (Int, Int, Int, Int, Int)
required: (Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int)
((1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)) zipWith ((6, 5, 4, 3, 2))
^
scala> ((1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)) zipWith ((6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1))
res1: (List[Any], List[Any])#Zipped[List[Any],Any,List[Any],Any] = scala.Tuple2$Zipped@42e934e
scala> res1 map ((x, y) => x.asInstanceOf[Int] + y.asInstanceOf[Int])
res2: List[Int] = List(7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
是的,一堆Anys出来了另一端.当你试图以这种方式强迫自己使用元组时,你可以做的并不是真正的惊心动魄.
编辑:哦,当然类型系统在这里给你完整的monty.
scala> ((1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)) zipWith ((6, 5, 4, 3, 2, "abc"))
<console>:8: error: type mismatch;
found : java.lang.String("abc")
required: Int
((1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6)) zipWith ((6, 5, 4, 3, 2, "abc"))
^
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
import scala.collection._
type Record = (Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int)
implicit def toIterable(r: Record) = new Iterable[Int]{
def iterator = r.productIterator.asInstanceOf[Iterator[Int]]
}
implicit def cbf[From <: Iterable[Int]] = new generic.CanBuildFrom[From, Int, Record] {
def apply(from: From) = apply
def apply = new mutable.Builder[Int, Record] {
var array = Array.ofDim[Int](6)
var i = 0
def +=(elem: Int) = {
array(i) += elem
i += 1
this
}
def clear() = i = 0
def result() = (array(0), array(1), array(2), array(3), array(4), array(5))
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
用法:
scala> ((1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), (6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1)).zipped.map{_ + _}
res1: (Int, Int, Int, Int, Int, Int) = (7,7,7,7,7,7)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
7482 次 |
| 最近记录: |