The*_*Cat 3 haskell list applicative
我想为自定义列表实现Applicative的实例.
import Test.QuickCheck
import Test.QuickCheck.Checkers
import Test.QuickCheck.Classes
data List a =
Nil
| Cons a (List a)
deriving (Eq, Show)
instance Eq a => EqProp (List a) where (=-=) = eq
instance Functor List where
fmap _ Nil = Nil
fmap f (Cons a Nil) = (Cons (f a) Nil)
fmap f (Cons a as) = (Cons (f a) (fmap f as))
main = do
let trigger = undefined :: List (Int, String, Int)
quickBatch $ applicative trigger
instance Arbitrary a => Arbitrary (List a) where
arbitrary = sized go
where go 0 = pure Nil
go n = do
xs <- go (n - 1)
x <- arbitrary
return (Cons x xs)
instance Applicative List where
pure x = (Cons x Nil)
Nil <*> _ = Nil
_ <*> Nil = Nil
(Cons f fs) <*> (Cons a as) = (Cons (f a) (fs <*> as))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这给出了以下错误:
?> main
applicative:
identity: *** Failed! Falsifiable (after 3 tests):
Cons 0 (Cons (-1) Nil)
composition: *** Failed! Falsifiable (after 3 tests):
Cons <function> (Cons <function> Nil)
Cons <function> (Cons <function> Nil)
Cons 1 (Cons (-2) Nil)
homomorphism: +++ OK, passed 500 tests.
interchange: +++ OK, passed 500 tests.
functor: *** Failed! Falsifiable (after 3 tests):
<function>
Cons (-2) (Cons (-1) Nil)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
首先是id法失败了:
?> Cons id Nil <*> Cons 0 (Cons (-1) Nil)
Cons 0 Nil
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我该如何解决?pure a不是List a这样我不知道如何在List上匹配并保留嵌套列表结构.
组成法也失败了,这并不奇怪:
?> (Cons "b" Nil) <*> (Cons "c" Nil)
<interactive>:295:7:
Couldn't match expected type ‘[Char] -> b’
with actual type ‘[Char]’
Relevant bindings include
it :: List b (bound at <interactive>:295:1)
In the first argument of ‘Cons’, namely ‘"b"’
In the first argument of ‘(<*>)’, namely ‘(Cons "b" Nil)’
In the expression: (Cons "b" Nil) <*> (Cons "c" Nil)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
编辑:因为我有很好的答案实现拉链列表的应用程序,我已经改变了关于ziplists的问题.
对于你ZipList喜欢的方法,我们希望保持以下左侧身份:
pure id <*> someList = someList
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为此,pure不能返回单元素列表,因为这将立即停止:
(Cons id Nil) <*> Cons 1 (Cons 2 Nil)
= Cons (id 1) (Nil <*> Cons 2 Nil)
= Cons 1 Nil
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这不是左侧身份的预期结果.如果pure不能只返回一个元素列表,它应该返回多少?答案是:无限:
repeatList :: a -> List a
repeatList x = let c = Cons x c in c
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为什么我称之为这种ZipList方法?因为它与in的行为相同Control.Applicative.ZipList,可以通过以下方式激发zipWith:
zipWithList :: (a -> b -> c) -> List a -> List b -> List c
zipWithList f (Cons x xs) (Cons y ys) = Cons (f x y) (zipWithList f xs ys)
zipWithList _ _ _ = Nil
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
现在你的实例是
instance Applicative List where
pure = repeatList
(<*>) = zipWithList ($)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,checkers由于您的EqProb实例,无法检查此实例,因为pure f <*> pure x == pure (f x)(同态)导致检查无限列表.不过,您可以提供另一种选择.例如,您可以采用任意数量的元素并进行比较:
prop_sameList :: Eq a => (Int, Int) -> List a -> List a -> Property
prop_sameList bounds xs ys = forAll (choose bounds) $ \n ->
takeList n xs `eq` takeList n ys
takeList :: Int -> List a -> List a
takeList _ Nil = Nil
takeList n (Cons x xs)
| n <= 0 = Nil
| otherwise = Cons x (takeList (n - 1) xs)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后,如果要比较至少1000和最多10000元素,可以使用:
instance Eq a => EqProb (List a) where
(=-=) = prop_sameList (1000, 10000)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
毕竟,我们只是想找到一个我们的财产不能容纳的清单.