Sas*_*lla 2 ruby ruby-on-rails
一些有效的ActiveRecord对象返回false的present?:
object.nil? # => false
object.valid? # => true
object.present? # => false
object.blank? # => true
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我喜欢object.present?过not object.nil?.什么决定了present?/ 的回报值blank??
编辑:找到了答案:我已经重新定义了empty?这个类的方法,而不是blank?或present?方法; 沿着@Simone的回答,blank?正在empty?幕后使用.
present?与...相反blank?.blank?实现取决于对象的类型.一般来说,当值为空或类似为空时,它返回true.
您可以查看该方法的测试:
BLANK = [ EmptyTrue.new, nil, false, '', ' ', " \n\t \r ", '?', "\u00a0", [], {} ]
NOT = [ EmptyFalse.new, Object.new, true, 0, 1, 'a', [nil], { nil => 0 } ]
def test_blank
BLANK.each { |v| assert_equal true, v.blank?, "#{v.inspect} should be blank" }
NOT.each { |v| assert_equal false, v.blank?, "#{v.inspect} should not be blank" }
end
def test_present
BLANK.each { |v| assert_equal false, v.present?, "#{v.inspect} should not be present" }
NOT.each { |v| assert_equal true, v.present?, "#{v.inspect} should be present" }
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
对象可以定义自己的解释blank?.例如
class Foo
def initialize(value)
@value = value
end
def blank?
@value != "foo"
end
end
Foo.new("bar").blank?
# => true
Foo.new("foo").blank?
# => false
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果未指定,它将回退到最接近的实现(例如Object).