use*_*860 6 c++ move move-semantics c++11
我有以下简化的代码示例:
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class ShouldBeMovedWhenSwapped
{
public:
// ShouldBeMovedWhenSwapped() = default;
// ShouldBeMovedWhenSwapped(ShouldBeMovedWhenSwapped&&) = default;
// ShouldBeMovedWhenSwapped(const ShouldBeMovedWhenSwapped&) = default;
// ShouldBeMovedWhenSwapped& operator=(ShouldBeMovedWhenSwapped&&) = default;
struct MoveTester
{
MoveTester() {}
MoveTester(const MoveTester&) { cout << "tester copied " << endl; }
MoveTester(MoveTester&&) { cout << "tester moved " << endl; }
MoveTester& operator=(MoveTester) { cout << "tester emplaced" << endl; return *this; } // must be declared if move declared
};
MoveTester tester;
};
int main()
{
ShouldBeMovedWhenSwapped a;
ShouldBeMovedWhenSwapped b;
std::swap(a,b);
return 0;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我正在使用MinGW,在运行'gcc --version'时,我得到了gcc 4.7.2
编辑:对于第一个问题,请参阅问题中的评论.它似乎是gcc中的一个错误.
代码的输出取决于注释掉的构造函数.但我不明白为什么会出现差异.每个输出背后的原因是什么?
// Everything commented out
tester moved
tester copied <---- why not moved?
tester emplaced
tester copied <---- why not moved?
tester emplaced
// Nothing commented out
tester moved
tester moved
tester emplaced
tester moved
tester emplaced
// Move constructor commented out
tester copied
tester moved
tester emplaced
tester moved
tester emplaced
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
对于我的第二个问题(这就是为什么我开始这个测试) - 假设我有一个大型向量而不是类MoveTester的真实案例,我怎样才能确定向量移动而不是在这种情况下被复制?
问题的第一部分是过时的编译器,但还有另一个问题:您MoveTester::operator=以次优方式声明 - 它按值获取参数,因此复制/移动构造函数被额外调用一次。尝试这个版本MoveTester:
struct MoveTester
{
MoveTester() {}
MoveTester(const MoveTester&) { cout << "tester copied " << endl; }
MoveTester(MoveTester&&) { cout << "tester moved " << endl; }
MoveTester& operator=(const MoveTester&) { cout << "tester copy assignment" << endl; return *this; } // must be declared if move declared
MoveTester& operator=(MoveTester&&) { cout << "tester move assignment" << endl; return *this; } // must be declared if move declared
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我得到以下输出:
tester moved
tester move assignment
tester move assignment
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
也许即使使用 GCC 4.7,您也会得到类似的结果。
关于你的第二个问题,标准保证 的移动构造函数std::vector具有恒定的时间复杂度。问题是编译器是否遵守标准。我相信唯一确定的方法是调试或分析您的代码。