efb*_*own 4 javascript default function
我有一个带有多个可选参数的函数.目前,该功能没有以我期望的方式分配默认值.
var test1 = function(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4) {
arg1 = arg1 || "arg1";
arg2 = arg2 || "arg2";
var obj = {
arg1: arg1,
arg2: arg2,
arg3: arg3,
arg4: arg4
};
return(obj);
};
var obj1 = test1(arg3 = "notarg1", arg4 = "notarg2"); // Why are these values assigned to arg1 & arg2 instead of 3 & 4?
console.log(obj1);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我不明白这一点.Javascript似乎忽略了我的(arg3 = "notarg1", arg4 = "notarg2")作业,而是表现得好像(arg1 = "notarg1", arg2 = "notarg2", arg3 = undefined, arg4 = undefined)是我的输入.
var test2 = function(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4) {
if (arg1 === null) {
arg1 = "arg1";
}
if (arg2 === null || arg2 === "undefined") {
arg2 = "arg2";
}
var obj = {
arg1: arg1,
arg2: arg2,
arg3: arg3,
arg4: arg4
};
return(obj);
};
var obj2 = test2(arg3 = "notarg1", arg4 = "notarg2")
console.log(obj2);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我不确定这是否值得包括.情况不会改变.
T.J*_*der 12
JavaScript没有用于命名调用函数时指定的参数的功能,所以这一行:
var obj1 = test1(arg3 = "notarg1", arg4 = "notarg2");
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
......不会做你认为它做的事情.它这样做:
arg3 = "notarg1";
arg4 = "notarg2";
var obj1 = test1("notarg1", "notarg2");
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
例如,arg3 = "notarg1"函数调用只是对变量的赋值(在这种情况下,可能是隐式全局),赋值运算符的工作方式是赋值,操作的结果是赋值的值. .
要使用代码获取args 1和2的默认值,您必须指定undefined:
var obj1 = test1(undefined, undefined, arg3, arg4);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在那里,你都指定ARGS 1和2,但你给他们的价值是falsey,所以你的函数的arg1 = arg1 || "arg1"需要"arg1"(以及类似的ARG2).
如果您有超过三个参数,则可以考虑使用选项对象:
function test1(options) {
var arg1 = options.arg1 || "arg1";
var arg2 = options.arg2 || "arg2";
var arg3 = options.arg3 || "arg3";
var arg4 = options.arg4 || "arg4";
console.log(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4)
}
test({arg3: "notarg1", arg4: "notarg2"});
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
输出:
arg1, arg2, notarg1, notarg2
为了完整起见,ES2015(又名ES6)添加了默认参数值,但您仍然无法按照问题中显示的方式调用函数.但是,ES2015语法确实简化了函数中的代码.
// ES2015+
function test1(arg1 = "arg1", arg2 = "arg2", arg3, arg4) {
// ....
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,再一次,在调用它时你所做的是相同的,仍然没有特殊的"匹配名称"功能,因为在某些语言中.