隐式转换为Runnable?

Pat*_*sen 17 scala implicit-conversion runnable

作为练习,我尝试创建一个隐式转换,它将接受一个函数并生成一个Runnable.这样你就可以调用接受Runnable对象的Java方法,并像封闭一样使用它们.

隐式转换很容易:

    implicit def funToRunnable(fun : Unit) = new Runnable() { def run = fun }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

但是我不知道怎么称呼它.如何传入一个返回Unit的无参数函数,而不是立即进行评估?例如,我想要以下内容来打印"12",而是打印"21"因为print("2")一次评估.

    var savedFun : Runnable = null
    def save(r : Runnable) = { savedFun = r }

    save(print("2"))
    print("1")
    savedFun.run()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

如何告诉编译器将其print("2")视为函数的主体,而不是立即进行评估?我试过的一些可能性,比如

    save(() => print("2"))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

要么

    save(=> print("2"))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

不是合法的语法.

Pat*_*sen 23

arg,刚刚回答了我自己的问题.我错误地实现了隐式转换.正确的实施是

implicit def funToRunnable(fun: () => Unit) = new Runnable() { def run() = fun() }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

你这样称呼它:

save(() => print("2"))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这将产生"2"

  • 它不应该产生2而不是12吗? (5认同)
  • `def run = run`将始终是无限递归.即使在封闭范围内定义了`run`,由此`def`定义的那个也会影响它,保证直接的,无条件的递归调用. (2认同)
  • @Support因为没有括号的乐趣只会创建一个返回传递函数的方法.要调用函数类型,必须使用括号,否则只需返回函数本身. (2认同)

Rex*_*err 12

如果你想危险地生活,你可以将任何东西转换成可运行的东西:

implicit def whateverToRunnable[F](f: => F) = new Runnable() { def run() { f } }

scala> val t = new Thread(println("Hello"))
t: java.lang.Thread = Thread[Thread-2,5,main]

scala> t.start()
Hello
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

或者你可以创建自己的线程创建者和启动者:

def thread[F](f: => F) = (new Thread( new Runnable() { def run() { f } } )).start

scala> thread { println("Hi"); Thread.sleep(1000); println("Still here!") }
Hi

scala> Still here!
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

如果你想返回线程,那么

def thread[F](f: => F) = {
  val t = new Thread( new Runnable() { def run() { f } } )
  t.start()
  t
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

但所有这一切虽然有用,但可能没有那么有用scala.actors.Futures(仅在2.8上测试过):

scala> import scala.actors.Futures

scala> val x = Futures.future { Thread.sleep(10000); "Done!" }
x: scala.actors.Future[java.lang.String] = <function0>

scala> x.isSet
res0: Boolean = false

scala> x.isSet
res1: Boolean = false

scala> x()   // Waits until the result is ready....
res2: java.lang.String = Done!
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)


Osc*_*Ryz 5

有趣的是,通过这种方式,您可以执行接收a的代码Runnable并将其传递给闭包.

看到:

scala> new Thread( ()  => print( "Hello" ) ).start()
<console>:5: error: overloaded method constructor Thread with alternatives (java.lang.ThreadGroup,java.lang.Runnable,java.lang.String,Long)java.lang.Thread <and> (java.lang.ThreadGroup,java.lang.Runnable,java.lang.String)java.lang.Thread <and> (java.lang.Runnable,java.lang.String)java.lang.Thread <and> (java.lang.ThreadGroup,java.lang.String)java.lang.Thread <and> (java.lang.String)ja...
       new Thread( ()  => print( "Hello" ) ).start()


scala> implicit def funcToRunnable( func : () => Unit ) = new Runnable(){ def run() = func() }
funcToRunnable: (() => Unit)java.lang.Object with java.lang.Runnable

scala> def doRun( runnable: Runnable ) = runnable.run
doRun: (Runnable)Unit

scala> doRun( () => print("Hola"))
Hola

scala> new Thread(()=>print("Hello")).start()

scala> Hello
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)


小智 5

实际上,您可以使用call-by-name参数来做得更好:

implicit def runnable(f: => Unit): Runnable = new Runnable() { def run() = f }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

用法:

import concurrent.ExecutionContext.Implicits.global._
execute(print("hello"))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)