Kid*_*rla 5 java exception-handling stack-trace
假设我正在处理FooException并BarException发生.我们假设它们都是未经检查的例外.
我想在stacktrace中看到的是:
com.bar.BarException: Bar Message
at com.baz.BazCode(BazCode.java:123)
...
Caused by: com.foo.FooException: Foo Message
at com.baz.BazCode(BazCode.java:321)
....
Caused by: ...
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,默认情况下,所有记录FooException都将从堆栈跟踪中删除.例如:
// In a class written by me
/**
* ...
* @throws FooException if foo happens
* @throws BarException if bar happens
*/
public void upperFrame() {
try {
foo.doSomething();
} catch (FooException foo) {
bar.doSomethingElse();
}
}
// In class Bar (not written by me)
public void doSomethingElse() {
if (someConditionWhichHappensToBeTrueInThisScenario()) {
throw new BarException("Hello Bar World"); // At this point, FooException gets erased from the stack trace
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果BarException有一个(message, cause)构造函数,那么我可以遵循一个相当粗略的"手动克隆"过程来实现我的目标:
try {
foo.doSomething();
} catch (FooException foo) {
try {
bar.doSomethingElse();
} catch (BarException bar) {
BarException bar2 = new BarException(bar.getMessage(), foo);
bar2.setStackTrace(bar.getStackTrace());
throw bar2;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,如果BarException没有这样的构造函数(例如ClassCastException)那么我可以简化为这样的事情:
try {
foo.doSomething();
} catch (FooException foo) {
try {
bar.doSomethingElse();
} catch (BarException bar) {
RuntimeException e = new RuntimeException("com.bar.BarException: " + bar.getMessage(), foo);
e.setStackTrace(bar.getStackTrace());
throw e;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这是危险的,因为e类型错误,因此可能无法通过更高的帧正确处理.
是否有"最佳实践"方式来处理这种情况?
一种解决方案是使用以下Throwable#initCause(Throwable)方法:
bar.initCause(foo);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)