use*_*059 5 c# arrays optimization parallel.foreach
操作是将数组的每个第i个元素(称为A)和相同大小的矩阵的第i个元素(B)相乘,并使用获得的值更新A的相同第i个元素.
在算术公式中,A'[i] = A [i]*B [i](0 <i <n(A))
在多核环境中优化此操作的最佳方法是什么?
这是我目前的代码;
var learningRate = 0.001f;
var m = 20000;
var n = 40000;
var W = float[m*n];
var C = float[m*n];
//my current code ...[1]
Parallel.ForEach(Enumerable.Range(0, m), i =>
{
for (int j = 0; j <= n - 1; j++)
{
W[i*n+j] *= C[i*n+j];
}
});
//This is somehow far slower than [1], but I don't know why ... [2]
Parallel.ForEach(Enumerable.Range(0, n*m), i =>
{
w[i] *= C[i]
});
//This is faster than [2], but not as fast as [1] ... [3]
for(int i = 0; i < m*n; i++)
{
w[i] *= C[i]
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
测试了以下方法.但表现并没有变得更好. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd560853.aspx
public static void Test1()
{
Random rnd = new Random(1);
var sw1 = new Stopwatch();
var sw2 = new Stopwatch();
sw1.Reset();
sw2.Reset();
int m = 10000;
int n = 20000;
int loops = 20;
var W = DummyDataUtils.CreateRandomMat1D(m, n);
var C = DummyDataUtils.CreateRandomMat1D(m, n);
for (int l = 0; l < loops; l++)
{
var v = DummyDataUtils.CreateRandomVector(n);
var b = DummyDataUtils.CreateRandomVector(m);
sw1.Start();
Parallel.ForEach(Enumerable.Range(0, m), i =>
{
for (int j = 0; j <= n - 1; j++)
{
W[i*n+j] *= C[i*n+j];
}
});
sw1.Stop();
sw2.Start();
// Partition the entire source array.
var rangePartitioner = Partitioner.Create(0, n*m);
// Loop over the partitions in parallel.
Parallel.ForEach(rangePartitioner, (range, loopState) =>
{
// Loop over each range element without a delegate invocation.
for (int i = range.Item1; i < range.Item2; i++)
{
W[i] *= C[i];
}
});
sw2.Stop();
Console.Write("o");
}
var t1 = (double)sw1.ElapsedMilliseconds / loops;
var t2 = (double)sw2.ElapsedMilliseconds / loops;
Console.WriteLine("t1: " + t1);
Console.WriteLine("t2: " + t2);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
结果:
t1:119
t2:120.4
问题在于,虽然调用委托相对较快,但当您多次调用它时,它就会增加,并且委托内部的代码非常简单。
您可以尝试使用 aPartitioner来指定要迭代的范围,这允许您为每个委托调用迭代许多项目(类似于您在 [1] 中所做的操作):
Parallel.ForEach(Partitioner.Create(0, n * m), partition =>
{
for (int i = partition.Item1; i < partition.Item2; i++)
{
W[i] *= C[i];
}
});
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)