J.W*_*.W. 7 c++ struct pointers vector segmentation-fault
我不确定为什么会这样:
main.cpp中:
int main(int argc, char * argv[]) {
Pwm_Info tf_info;
tf_info = get_pwm_info(library_data, motif_name);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Gen.cpp
struct Pwm_Info {
std::string motif_name;
int width;
std::vector < double > pwm;
Pwm_Info(): motif_name(0),
width(0),
pwm(0) {}
}
TF_info;
Pwm_Info get_pwm_info(std::string library_data, std::string motif_name) {
std::vector < double > double_list;
strtk::parse(pwm_block, " \n\r", double_list);
std::cout << double_list.size() << std::endl;
Pwm_Info TF_info;
TF_info.motif_name = motif_name;
TF_info.width = n_width;
std::vector < double > * pointer;
std::vector < double > * pointer2;
pointer = & TF_info.pwm;
pointer2 = & double_list; * pointer = * pointer2;
std::cout << TF_info.pwm[1] << std::endl;
TF_info.pwm = double_list;
return TF_info;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
以前,我删除了指向TF_info和双列表的指针,只是有了这一行:
TF_info.pwm = double_list;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
......导致了SegFault.创建指针(指针和指针2)的重点是什么?
pointer = &TF_info.pwm;
pointer2 = &double_list;
*pointer = *pointer2;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
and
TF_info.pwm = double_list;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
are totally equivalent!
The only line which could possibily cause a segfault is:
std::cout << TF_info.pwm[1] << std::endl;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)