将向量分配给struct的向量字段

J.W*_*.W. 7 c++ struct pointers vector segmentation-fault

我不确定为什么会这样:

main.cpp中:

int main(int argc, char * argv[]) {
    Pwm_Info tf_info;
    tf_info = get_pwm_info(library_data, motif_name);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Gen.cpp

        struct Pwm_Info {
    std::string motif_name;
    int width;
    std::vector < double > pwm;
    Pwm_Info(): motif_name(0),
    width(0),
    pwm(0) {}
}
TF_info;

Pwm_Info get_pwm_info(std::string library_data, std::string motif_name) {
    std::vector < double > double_list;
    strtk::parse(pwm_block, " \n\r", double_list);
    std::cout << double_list.size() << std::endl;

    Pwm_Info TF_info;

    TF_info.motif_name = motif_name;
    TF_info.width = n_width;

    std::vector < double > * pointer;
    std::vector < double > * pointer2;

    pointer = & TF_info.pwm;
    pointer2 = & double_list; * pointer = * pointer2;
    std::cout << TF_info.pwm[1] << std::endl;
    TF_info.pwm = double_list;
    return TF_info;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

以前,我删除了指向TF_info和双列表的指针,只是有了这一行:

  TF_info.pwm = double_list;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

......导致了SegFault.创建指针(指针和指针2)的重点是什么?

Seb*_*ann 2

pointer = &TF_info.pwm;
pointer2 = &double_list;
*pointer = *pointer2;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

and

TF_info.pwm = double_list;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

are totally equivalent!


The only line which could possibily cause a segfault is:

std::cout << TF_info.pwm[1] << std::endl;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)