Ank*_*wal 2 python performance
cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:3981272 kB
我在python中运行了这个简单的测试
#!/usr/bin/env python
import sys
num = int(sys.argv[1])
li = []
for i in xrange(num):
li.append(i)
$ time ./listappend.py 1000000
real 0m0.342s
user 0m0.304s
sys 0m0.036s
$ time ./listappend.py 2000000
real 0m0.646s
user 0m0.556s
sys 0m0.084s
$ time ./listappend.py 4000000
real 0m1.254s
user 0m1.136s
sys 0m0.116s
$ time ./listappend.py 8000000
real 0m2.424s
user 0m2.176s
sys 0m0.236s
$ time ./listappend.py 16000000
real 0m4.832s
user 0m4.364s
sys 0m0.452s
$ time ./listappend.py 32000000
real 0m9.737s
user 0m8.637s
sys 0m1.028s
$ time ./listappend.py 64000000
real 0m56.296s
user 0m17.797s
sys 0m3.180s
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
题:
64000000的时间是32000000的6倍,但在此之前,时间只是倍增.为什么这样 ?
小智 6
TL;DR - Due to RAM being insufficient & the memory being swapped out to secondary storage.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我在盒子上运行了不同大小的程序.结果如下
/usr/bin/time ./test.py 16000000
2.90user 0.26system 0:03.17elapsed 99%CPU 513480maxresident
0inputs+0outputs (0major+128715minor)pagefaults
/usr/bin/time ./test.py 32000000
6.10 user 0.49 system 0:06.64 elapsed 99%CPU 1022664maxresident
40inputs (2major+255998minor)pagefaults
/usr/bin/time ./test.py 64000000
12.70 user 0.98 system 0:14.09 elapsed 97%CPU 2040132maxresident
4272inputs (22major+510643minor)pagefaults
/usr/bin/time ./test.py 128000000
30.57 user 23.29 system 27:12.32 elapsed 3%CPU 3132276maxresident
19764880inputs (389184major+4129375minor)pagefaults
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
User time程序作为用户运行的时间.(运行用户逻辑)System time程序作为系统执行的时间.(即在系统调用中花费的时间)Elapsed time程序执行的总时间.(包括等待时间..)
Elapsed time = User time + System Time + time spent waiting
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)Major Page Fault 当内存页不在RAM中并且必须从硬盘等辅助设备获取时发生.
16M列表大小:列表主要在内存中.因此没有页面错误.
由于unutbu指出python解释器O(n*n)为列表分配额外的空间,因为它们的增长情况只会恶化.