我有一个问题
SELECT DISTINCT phoneNum
FROM `Transaction_Register`
WHERE phoneNum NOT IN (SELECT phoneNum FROM `Subscription`)
LIMIT 0 , 1000000
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
执行b/c Transaction_Register表需要太多时间有数百万条记录是否有任何上述查询的替代方案我会感激你们,如果有的话.
Tar*_*ryn 15
另一种方法是使用LEFT JOIN:
select distinct t.phoneNum
from Transaction_Register t
left join Subscription s
on t.phoneNum = s.phoneNum
where s.phoneNum is null
LIMIT 0 , 1000000;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我怀疑是否LEFT JOIN真的比NOT IN. 我只是用下表结构进行了一些测试(如果我错了,请纠正我):
account (id, ....) [42,884 rows, index by id]
play (account_id, playdate, ...) [61,737 rows, index by account_id]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
(1) 查询 LEFT JOIN
SELECT * FROM
account LEFT JOIN play ON account.id = play.account_id
WHERE play.account_id IS NULL
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
(2) 查询 NOT IN
SELECT * FROM
account WHERE
account.id NOT IN (SELECT play.account_id FROM play)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
使用 LIMIT 0 进行速度测试,...
LIMIT 0,-> 100 150 200 250
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEFT 3.213s 4.477s 5.881s 7.472s
NOT EXIST 2.200s 3.261s 4.320s 5.647s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Difference 1.013s 1.216s 1.560s 1.825s
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
随着我增加限制,差异越来越大
EXPLAIN(1) 查询 LEFT JOIN
SELECT_TYPE TABLE TYPE ROWS EXTRA
-------------------------------------------------
SIMPLE account ALL 42,884
SIMPLE play ALL 61,737 Using where; not exists
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
(2) 查询 NOT IN
SELECT_TYPE TABLE TYPE ROWS EXTRA
-------------------------------------------------
SIMPLE account ALL 42,884 Using where
DEPENDENT SUBQUERY play INDEX 61,737 Using where; Using index
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
似乎 LEFT JOIN 没有使用索引
(1) 查询 LEFT JOIN
account 和 play 之间的 LEFT JOIN 后将产生 42,884 * 61,737 = 2,647,529,508 行。然后检查这些行上的 play.account_id 是否为 NULL。
(2) 查询 NOT IN
二分搜索采用 log2(N) 来表示项目存在。这意味着 42,884 * log2(61,737) = 686,144 步