相当简单的问题,
auto x11 {1,2,3,4};
auto x1 = {1,2,3,4};
auto x22 {1.0, 2.25, 3.5};
auto x2 = {1.0, 2.25, 3.5};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
据我了解,这里应该没有区别=.但是,使用llvm/clang 6.0.0(使用--std = c ++ 17),我得到:
main1.cpp:35:17: error: initializer for variable 'x11' with type 'auto' contains multiple
expressions
auto x11 {1,2,3,4};
~~~~~~~~ ^
main1.cpp:37:20: error: initializer for variable 'x22' with type 'auto' contains multiple
expressions
auto x22 {1.0, 2.25, 3.5};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
从Stroustroup的C++书籍,第162页:
auto x1 {1,2,3,4}; // x1 is an initializer_list<int>
auto x2 {1.0, 2.25, 3.5 }; // x2 is an …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 我使用Apache Spark 2.1.1(使用2.1.0,它是相同的,今天切换).我有一个数据集:
root
|-- muons: array (nullable = true)
| |-- element: struct (containsNull = true)
| | |-- reco::Candidate: struct (nullable = true)
| | |-- qx3_: integer (nullable = true)
| | |-- pt_: float (nullable = true)
| | |-- eta_: float (nullable = true)
| | |-- phi_: float (nullable = true)
| | |-- mass_: float (nullable = true)
| | |-- vertex_: struct (nullable = true)
| | | |-- fCoordinates: struct (nullable …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 下面是试图在编译时检查默认构造函数是否存在的代码段。编译这个
clang version 11.0.0
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/local/opt/llvm/bin
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
使用选项 clang++ --std=c++17 -o test_default_ctor test_default_ctor.cpp
clang version 11.0.0
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin19.6.0
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/local/opt/llvm/bin
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
编译的输出将是
test_default_ctor.cpp:33:5: error: static_assert failed due to requirement '!has_default_ctor_2<Test3, void>::value' "Test has default ctor"
static_assert(not has_default_ctor_2<Test3>::value, "Test has default ctor");
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
问题是为什么在模板特化中使用()vs{}进行构造函数调用使它在一种情况下工作但在另一种情况下不起作用?
当查看boost asio co_spawn文档(https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_78_0/doc/html/boost_asio/reference/co_spawn/overload6.html)时,我看到这样的说法:“生成一个新的基于协程的线程执行”,但是我的理解是,它co_spawn不会创建实际的线程,而是使用属于boost::asio::io_context池的一部分的线程。从某种意义上说,它是一个“基于协程的执行线程”,该协程将是从该协程内部生成的所有协程的根
我的理解是否正确,或者每当co_spawn像这样使用时都会创建一个实际的线程:
::boost::asio::co_spawn(io_ctx, [&] -> ::boost::asio::awaitable<void> {
// do something
}, ::boost::asio::detached);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
谢谢!