有没有办法阻止用户通过刷卡来解雇零食吧?
我有一个应用程序,在网络登录期间显示一个小吃店,我想避免它被解雇.
根据Nikola Despotoski的建议,我已经尝试了两种解决方案:
private void startSnack(){
loadingSnack = Snackbar.make(findViewById(R.id.email_login_form), getString(R.string.logging_in), Snackbar.LENGTH_INDEFINITE)
.setAction("CANCEL", new OnClickListener() {
@Override
public void onClick(View view) {
getOps().cancelLogin();
enableControls();
}
});
loadingSnack.getView().setOnTouchListener(new View.OnTouchListener() {
public long mInitialTime;
@Override
public boolean onTouch(View v, MotionEvent event) {
if (v instanceof Button) return false; //Action view was touched, proceed normally.
else {
switch (MotionEventCompat.getActionMasked(event)) {
case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN: {
Log.i(TAG, "ACTION_DOWN");
mInitialTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
break;
}
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP: {
Log.i(TAG, "ACTION_UP");
long clickDuration = System.currentTimeMillis() - mInitialTime;
if (clickDuration …
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 我们有一个 Android 应用程序,使用 WorkManager 来处理后台同步工作。我们的同步工作者是这样的:
public class SyncWorker extends Worker {
[...]
@NonNull
@Override
public Result doWork() {
if (canNotRetry(getRunAttemptCount())) {
// This could seem unreachable, consider removing... or not... because if stopped by the
// system, the work might be retried by design
CBlogger.INSTANCE.log([...]);
return Result.success();
}
boolean syncOk = false;
//Sync
try (Realm realm = Realm.getDefaultInstance()) {
// Doing sync related ops & network calls
// checking this.isStopped() between operations to quit
// sync activity when worker has …
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 来自Google Developers - 为您的应用启用Google服务我已针对特定的软件包名称启用了Google Cloud Messaging.
然后我发现我启用服务的软件包名称是错误的,所以我添加了正确的软件包.
现在,如何从已启用的包列表中删除错误的包名?两个注册都导致下载的google-services.json文件也包含错误的包名称的详细信息.
在Google Developers Console - >适用于Android的云消息传递中,未列出任何选项,仅启用/禁用API.我解散了API,但重复该过程仍然导致相同的结果,JSON包含两个包名称.
如果用户将设备拔出并静止一段时间,屏幕关闭,设备将进入打盹模式.
在打盹模式启动之前,设备需要多长时间保持空闲和静止?
等等:
系统会定期退出Doze一段时间,让应用程序完成其延期活动.在此维护窗口期间[...]随着时间的推移,系统会越来越频繁地安排维护窗口......
那么,维护窗口间隔及其增长率是多少?
我有一个由 3 个节点组成的 GCE 容器集群。在每个节点上,我都运行一个像这样的 POD:
apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
name: test-deployment
spec:
replicas: 3
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: none
track: stable
spec:
containers:
- name: hello
image: gcr.io/persistent-volumes-test/alpine:v1.2
resources:
limits:
cpu: 0.2
memory: "10Mi"
volumeMounts:
- mountPath: "/persistentDisk"
name: persistent-disk
ports:
- containerPort: 65535
name: anti-affinity
hostPort: 65535
volumes:
- name: persistent-disk
persistentVolumeClaim:
claimName: myclaim
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
定义“反关联”端口的技巧可确保每个 POD 运行在不同的节点上。我创建了 3 个 PersistentVolume,定义如下:
kind: PersistentVolume
apiVersion: v1
metadata:
name: persistent-volume-1
annotations:
volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-class: "slow"
labels:
release: "dev"
spec:
capacity:
storage: 10Gi …
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)