我试图模拟SQL Server上的死锁.
_|worker_id|salary|
1|1 |100 |
2|2 |300 |
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
交易1在5秒内完成.
/* TRANSACTION 1*/
Use dbmcw;
DECLARE @sal1 INT, @sal2 int;
BEGIN TRAN;
SELECT @sal1 = salary
FROM dbo.deadlock_demonstration WITH(UPDLOCK)
WHERE worker_id = 1;
WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:05.000';
SELECT @sal2 = salary
FROM dbo.deadlock_demonstration WITH(UPDLOCK)
WHERE worker_id = 2;
COMMIT TRAN;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
交易2在3秒内完成.
/* TRANSACTION 2*/
Use dbmcw;
DECLARE @sal1 INT, @sal2 int;
BEGIN TRAN;
SELECT @sal2 = salary
FROM dbo.deadlock_demonstration WITH(UPDLOCK)
WHERE worker_id = 2;
SELECT @sal1 = salary
FROM dbo.deadlock_demonstration WITH(UPDLOCK) …
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 我是PostgreSQL的新手.我想为这个时间表模拟死锁:
如何在PostgreSQL中模拟死锁?有可能吗?如何锁定特定列?
编辑:
BEGIN;
UPDATE deadlock_demonstration
SET salary1=(SELECT salary1
FROM deadlock_demonstration
WHERE worker_id = 1
FOR UPDATE)+100
WHERE worker_id=1;
SELECT pg_sleep(5);
commit;
SELECT salary2 FROM deadlock_demonstration WHERE worker_id = 1 FOR UPDATE;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在另一个屏幕中,我已经运行了这个
BEGIN;
UPDATE deadlock_demonstration
SET salary2=(SELECT salary1
FROM deadlock_demonstration
WHERE worker_id = 1
FOR UPDATE)+200
WHERE worker_id=1;
SELECT pg_sleep(5);
commit;
SELECT salary1 FROM deadlock_demonstration WHERE worker_id = 1 FOR UPDATE;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为什么没有发生死锁?你能给出一个建议,我应该改变什么来刺激僵局?