是否有更简洁,高效或简单的pythonic方式来执行以下操作?
def product(list):
p = 1
for i in list:
p *= i
return p
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
编辑:
我实际上发现这比使用operator.mul要快一些:
from operator import mul
# from functools import reduce # python3 compatibility
def with_lambda(list):
reduce(lambda x, y: x * y, list)
def without_lambda(list):
reduce(mul, list)
def forloop(list):
r = 1
for x in list:
r *= x
return r
import timeit
a = range(50)
b = range(1,50)#no zero
t = timeit.Timer("with_lambda(a)", "from __main__ import with_lambda,a")
print("with lambda:", t.timeit())
t = timeit.Timer("without_lambda(a)", "from __main__ …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 我无法弄清楚为什么这个python函数返回None,如果它递归调用自己.
这是我解决项目欧拉问题的一部分.无论如何我已经以更好的方式解决了这个问题,但是这仍然让我烦恼,因为函数似乎工作正常 - 它似乎知道我想要返回的变量的值.
def next_prime(previous):
if previous % 2 == 0:
candidate = previous + 1
else:
candidate = previous + 2
print "trying", candidate
prime = True
for div in range(2,candidate//2,1):
if candidate % div == 0:
prime = False
print candidate, "is not prime - divisible by", div
next_prime(candidate)
break
if prime is True:
print candidate, "is prime"
#return candidate
last = 896576
print "After", last, ", the next prime is..."
next_prime(last)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这给出了:
After 896576 , the …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)