小编mar*_*tin的帖子

我的问题(在此之后,对于长篇介绍感到抱歉,问题在于粗体)最初的灵感来自于Herb Sutters Exceptional C++中的第23项,我们发现这样的内容:
<snip>

...
int main()
{
  GenericTableAlgorithm a( "Customer", MyWorker() );
  a.Process();
}

同

class GenericTableAlgorithm
{
public:
  GenericTableAlgorithm( const string& table,
                         GTAClient&    worker );
  bool Process(); 
private:
  struct GenericTableAlgorithmImpl* pimpl_; //implementation
};
class GTAClient
{
   ///...
   virtual bool ProcessRow( const PrimaryKey& ) =0;
   //...
};
class MyWorker : public GTAClient 
{
  // ... override Filter() and ProcessRow() to
  //     implement a specific operation ...
};

</剪断>

现在,我对该代码存在以下问题(不,我绝不怀疑Sutter先生作为C++专家的实力):

问题类似于这个bug

关于在C++中将数组存储在std :: vector中的问题

但出于不同的原因(见下文).

对于C++中的以下示例程序:

#include <vector>

int main(int c_, char ** v_)
{
        const int LENGTH = 100;

        std::vector<char[LENGTH]> ca_vector;

        return 0;

}

GCC 4.2.3编译干净.GCC 4.3.2发出以下错误:

/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/g++-v4/bits/stl_construct.h: In function ‘void std::_Destroy(_Tp*) [with _Tp = char [100]]’:
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/g++-v4/bits/stl_construct.h:103:   instantiated from ‘void std::_Destroy(_ForwardIterator, _ForwardIterator) [with _ForwardIterator = char (*)[100]]’
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/g++-v4/bits/stl_construct.h:128:   instantiated from ‘void std::_Destroy(_ForwardIterator, _ForwardIterator, std::allocator&) [with _ForwardIterator = char (*)[100], _Tp = char [100]]’
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.3.2/include/g++-v4/bits/stl_vector.h:300:   instantiated from ‘std::vector::~vector() [with _Tp = char [100], _Alloc = std::allocator]’
test.cpp:7:   instantiated from …