对于该计划:
#include<stdio.h>
int main(void)
{
int (*a)[2];
int b[5];
printf("sizeof(int) : %zu\n", sizeof(int));
printf("sizeof(int*) : %zu\n", sizeof(int*));
printf("sizeof(b) : %zu\n",sizeof(b));
printf("sizeof((int*)b) : %zu\n",sizeof((int*)b));
printf("sizeof(&b[0]) : %zu\n",sizeof(&b[0]));
printf("sizeof(a) : %zu\n",sizeof(a));
printf("sizeof(a[0]) : %zu\n",sizeof(a[0]));
printf("sizeof(a[1]) : %zu\n",sizeof(a[1]));
return 0;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
输出是:
sizeof(int) : 4 -> Fact 1
sizeof(int*) : 8 -> Fact 2
sizeof(b) : 20 -> Case 1
sizeof((int*)b) : 8 -> Case 2
sizeof(&b[0]) : 8 -> Case 3
sizeof(a) : 8 -> Case 4
sizeof(a[0]) : 8 -> Case …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 在bash中:
echo "*" #Globbing is never done
echo "$variable" # Variable expansion is always done
echo "$(command)" # command expansion is always done
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
echo '*' #Globbing is never done
echo '$variable' # Variable expansion is never done
echo '$(command)' # command expansion is never done
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
echo * #Globbing always done.
echo $variable; # Variable expansion is always done
echo $(command) # command expansion is always done
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这适用于所有命令吗?
我有两个文件37064544_p1.cpp,37064544_p2.cpp内容相同,如下所示:
int add(int x,int y)
{
return x+y;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我用它们编译了它们
g++ -c 37064544_p2.cpp -o 37064544_p2.o
g++ -c 37064544_p2.cpp -o 37064544_p2.o
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
并使用将它们添加到存档中
ar -rsc lib37064544pf.a 37064544_p1.o 37064544_p2.o
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
和
$ nm -s lib37064544pf.a
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
给我 :
Archive index:
_Z3addii in 37064544_p1.o
_Z3addii in 37064544_p2.o
37064544_p1.o:
0000000000000000 T _Z3addii
37064544_p2.o:
0000000000000000 T _Z3addii
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
和
$ ar -t lib37064544pf.a
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
给我
37064544_p1.o
37064544_p2.o
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我有一个驱动程序,它调用_Z3addii编译的函数
g++ -static 37064544driver.cpp -o 37064544driver.elf -L. -l37064544pf
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
结果是
Sum : 11
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
问题
符号是如何_Z3addii解决的?
Stephen Prata在他的着作C++ Primer Plus [p 31]中说:
许多现有程序使用经典的C函数头代码:
main() // original C style
在经典C下,省略返回类型与声明函数类型为int相同.但是,C++已逐步淘汰了这种用法.
但是C++ 11草案3.6.1-> 2说
实现不应预定义主函数.此功能不应过载.它应该具有int类型的返回类型,否则其类型是实现定义的.
测试结果
$ g++ -Werror=pedantic MainCheck.cpp -o MainCheck
MainCheck.cpp:3:6: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of ‘main’ with no type [-Werror=pedantic]
main()
$ # also means g++ don't conform to the standard
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
确认普拉塔先生在C++标准方面所说的是正确的.
C++ 11草案中是否有一个条款不鼓励使用:
main() // that is without return type.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
是
它的返回类型应为int类型
本身这样一个条款?
请考虑以下代码:
$ var1=bingo
$ var2=.ingo
$ if [[ "$var1" =~ $var2 ]]; then echo found; fi
found
$ if [[ $var1 =~ "$var2" ]]; then echo found; fi # line 5
$ if [[ "$var1" =~ "$var2" ]]; then echo found; fi # line 6
$ if [[ $var1 =~ $var2 ]]; then echo found; fi
found
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
以上就是我在bash shell中所做的.
问题是为什么没有线5和6打印found?
我想我已经知道了答案,但我正在寻找一个简单易懂的答案.
总而言之,当在右侧使用变量(内部双引号)时=~,双引号是否仅用于变量扩展?
getInitialLink() 在第一次检索后继续提供有效的动态链接。这会导致用户不断被迫进入与深层链接关联的页面的循环。
\nRunning `flutter doctor --verbose` produced the below results.\n\n[\xe2\x9c\x93] Flutter (Channel stable, 1.20.4, on Mac OS X 10.15.6 19G2021, locale en-US)\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Flutter version 1.20.4 at /Users/sjsam/Documents/Developement/flutter\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Framework revision fba99f6cf9 (5 days ago), 2020-09-14 15:32:52 -0700\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Engine revision d1bc06f032\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Dart version 2.9.2\n\n \n[\xe2\x9c\x93] Android toolchain - develop for Android devices (Android SDK version 28.0.3)\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Android SDK at /Users/sjsam/Library/Android/sdk\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Platform android-29, build-tools 28.0.3\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Java binary at: /Applications/Android Studio.app/Contents/jre/jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java\n \xe2\x80\xa2 Java version OpenJDK Runtime …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 假设我有
int i=25;
double j=(double)i;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
是否有机会j拥有价值观24.9999999..upto_allowed或25.00000000..._upto_allowed_minus_one_and_then_1.我记得在某处读过这些东西但却无法正常回忆.
换一种说法:
是否存在整数在转换为double时失去其精度的情况?
我希望使用a来压缩top命令的一般信息top parameter.
一般信息我的意思是以下内容:
top - 09:35:05 up 3:26, 2 users, load average: 0.29, 0.22, 0.21
Tasks: 1 total, 0 running, 1 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 2.3%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 96.3%id, 0.8%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 3840932k total, 2687880k used, 1153052k free, 88380k buffers
Swap: 3998716k total, 0k used, 3998716k free, 987076k cached
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我不想做的是:
top -u user | grep process_name
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
要么
top -bp $(pgrep process_name) | do_something
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我怎样才能做到这一点?
注意:我在Ubuntu 12.04上,顶级版本是3.2.8.
I've got a mapping file of about 13491 key/value pairs which I need to use to replace the key with the value in a data set of about 500000 lines divided over 25 different files.
Example mapping:
value1,value2
Example input: field1,field2,**value1**,field4
Example output: field1,field2,**value2**,field4
Please note that the value could be in different places on the line with more than 1 occurrence.
My current approach is with AWK:
awk -F, 'NR==FNR { a[$1]=$2 ; next } { for (i in …
在C中,我可以使用以下代码自动连接信号:
gtk_builder_connect_signals (builder, NULL)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如何使用GTKmm在C++中执行此操作?