我正在浏览Exchange Web Services Java API代码,并看到了开发人员将参数传递给其方法的设计选择.您可以帮助解释一下该技术的好处 -
在传递给方法之前,该方法要处理的类型由Generic Wrapper类包装,例如,如果该方法要处理String,则将新的Param()传递给Param定义为的方法如下
class Param<T> {
private T param;
public T getParam() { return param; }
public void setParam(T param) { this.param = param }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这是源代码片段 - 该方法适用于HttpWebRequest对象.
调用者创建Param的实例,即由HttpWebRequest类限定.然后将该实例传递给方法,如方法签名中所示 -
protected HttpWebRequest emit(OutParam<HttpWebRequest> request)
throws Exception {
request.setParam(this.getService().prepareHttpWebRequest());
OutputStream urlOutStream = request.getParam().getOutputStream();
EwsServiceXmlWriter writer = new EwsServiceXmlWriter(this.service,urlOutStream);
this.writeToXml(writer);
urlOutStream.flush();
urlOutStream.close();
writer.dispose();
request.getParam().executeRequest();
if(request.getParam().getResponseCode() >= 400)
{
throw new Exception("The remote server returned an error:("+request.getParam().getResponseCode()+")"+request.getParam().getResponseText());
}
return request.getParam();
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
那么为什么不直接传递HttpWebRequest对象 - 开发人员在整个代码库中反复使用这种模式,这让我觉得它有一些很好的理由.但我只是看不到好处...请指教.