我正在尝试使用 Reactive Extensions (Rx) 来处理数据流。但是,每个元素的处理可能需要一些时间。为了中断处理,我使用了CancellationToken,它有效地停止了订阅。
当请求取消时,如何优雅地完成当前工作并正确终止而不会丢失任何数据?
var cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
cts.Token.Register(() => Console.WriteLine("Token cancelled."));
var observable = Observable
.Interval(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(250));
observable
.Subscribe(
value =>
{
Console.WriteLine(value);
Thread.Sleep(500); // Simulate processing
if (cts.Token.IsCancellationRequested)
{
Console.WriteLine("Cancellation detected on {0}.", value);
Thread.Sleep(500); // Simulate some time consuming shutdown
Console.WriteLine("Cleaning up done for {0}.", value);
}
},
() => Console.WriteLine("Completed"),
cts.Token);
Console.ReadLine();
cts.Cancel();
Console.WriteLine("Job terminated.");
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
0
1
2
Token cancelled.
Job terminated.
Cancellation detected on 2.
Cleaning up done for …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 我是 rx 的新手,并且一直在使用 dot net 中的反应式扩展来处理一些网络代码。我的问题是,当我通过我提供的令牌触发取消时,我使用异步函数创建的 tcpClients 的 observable 没有像我预期的那样完成。这是我遇到问题的代码的简化版本:
public static class ListenerExtensions
{
public static IObservable<TcpClient> ToListenerObservable(
this IPEndPoint endpoint,
int backlog)
{
return new TcpListener(endpoint).ToListenerObservable(backlog);
}
public static IObservable<TcpClient> ToListenerObservable(
this TcpListener listener,
int backlog)
{
return Observable.Create<TcpClient>(async (observer, token) =>
{
listener.Start(backlog);
try
{
while (!token.IsCancellationRequested)
observer.OnNext(await Task.Run(() => listener.AcceptTcpClientAsync(), token));
//This never prints and onCompleted is never called.
Console.WriteLine("Completing..");
observer.OnCompleted();
}
catch (System.Exception error)
{
observer.OnError(error);
}
finally
{
//This is never executed and my …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)