更新:看到每个方法可能会遇到不同的性能问题,我决定将这个问题分成两个:
最初的讨论可以在下面找到......
当我遇到一些令人惊讶的数据时,我正在比较我的库在Java 8和11下的性能.这是基准代码:
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Benchmark;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.BenchmarkMode;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.Mode;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.OutputTimeUnit;
import org.openjdk.jmh.infra.Blackhole;
import java.io.PrintWriter;
import java.io.StringWriter;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.AverageTime)
@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS)
public class MyBenchmark
{
@Benchmark
public void emptyMethod()
{
}
@Benchmark
public void throwAndConsumeStacktrace(Blackhole bh)
{
try
{
throw new IllegalArgumentException("I love benchmarks");
}
catch (IllegalArgumentException e)
{
StringWriter sw = new StringWriter();
e.printStackTrace(new PrintWriter(sw));
bh.consume(sw.toString());
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
运行jmh 1.21,OracleJDK 1.8.0_192返回:
MyBenchmark.emptyMethod avgt 25 0.363 ± 0.001 ns/op
MyBenchmark.throwAndConsumeStacktrace avgt …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 当我遇到一些令人惊讶的数字时,我正在使用jmh 1.21 比较JDK 8和11的性能:
Java version: 1.8.0_192, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
MyBenchmark.emptyMethod avgt 25 0.362 ± 0.001 ns/op
Java version: 9.0.4, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
MyBenchmark.emptyMethod avgt 25 0.362 ± 0.001 ns/op
Java version: 10.0.2, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
MyBenchmark.emptyMethod avgt 25 0.723 ± 0.001 ns/op
Java version: 11.0.1, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
MyBenchmark.emptyMethod avgt 25 0.724 ± 0.002 …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)