我为Project Euler Q14编写了这两个解决方案,在汇编和C++中.它们是用于测试Collatz猜想的相同蛮力方法.装配解决方案与组装
nasm -felf64 p14.asm && gcc p14.o -o p14
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
C++是用.编译的
g++ p14.cpp -o p14
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
部件, p14.asm
section .data
fmt db "%d", 10, 0
global main
extern printf
section .text
main:
mov rcx, 1000000
xor rdi, rdi ; max i
xor rsi, rsi ; i
l1:
dec rcx
xor r10, r10 ; count
mov rax, rcx
l2:
test rax, 1
jpe even
mov rbx, 3
mul rbx
inc rax
jmp c1
even:
mov rbx, 2 …
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 以下所有说明都做同样的事情:设置%eax
为零.哪种方式最佳(需要最少的机器周期)?
xorl %eax, %eax
mov $0, %eax
andl $0, %eax
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) 此循环在英特尔Conroe/Merom上每3个周期运行一次,imul
按预期方式在吞吐量方面存在瓶颈.但是在Haswell/Skylake上,它每11个循环运行一次,显然是因为setnz al
它依赖于最后一个循环imul
.
; synthetic micro-benchmark to test partial-register renaming
mov ecx, 1000000000
.loop: ; do{
imul eax, eax ; a dep chain with high latency but also high throughput
imul eax, eax
imul eax, eax
dec ecx ; set ZF, independent of old ZF. (Use sub ecx,1 on Silvermont/KNL or P4)
setnz al ; ****** Does this depend on RAX as well as ZF?
movzx eax, al
jnz .loop ; }while(ecx);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果setnz al …