相关疑难解决方法(0)

有人可以帮我理解这个: -

(gdb) info frame
Stack level 0, frame at 0xb75f7390:
 eip = 0x804877f in base::func() (testing.cpp:16); saved eip 0x804869a
 called by frame at 0xb75f73b0
 source language c++.
 Arglist at 0xb75f7388, args: this=0x0
 Locals at 0xb75f7388, Previous frame's sp is 0xb75f7390
 Saved registers:
  ebp at 0xb75f7388, eip at 0xb75f738c

什么是"ebp,eip Locals at和Previous Frame's sp"是什么意思？请解释

根据英特尔在x64中,以下寄存器称为通用寄存器(RAX,RBX,RCX,RDX,RBP,RSI,RDI,RSP和R8-R15)https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/介绍到x64组装.

在下面的文章中,写了RBP和RSP是专用寄存器(RBP指向当前堆栈帧的基础,RSP指向当前堆栈帧的顶部). https://www.recurse.com/blog/7-understanding-c-by-learning-assembly

现在我有两个相互矛盾的陈述.英特尔声明应该是值得信赖的,但是什么是正确的,为什么RBP和RSP被称为通用目的？

谢谢你的帮助.

我编写了可以编译的汇编代码:

as power.s -o power.o

当我链接power.o目标文件时出现问题:

ld power.o -o power

为了在64位操作系统(Ubuntu 14.04)上运行,我.code32在power.s文件的开头添加了,但是我仍然得到错误:

分段故障(核心转储)

power.s:

.code32
.section .data
.section .text
.global _start
_start:
pushl $3
pushl $2 
call power 
addl $8, %esp
pushl %eax 

pushl $2
pushl $5
call power
addl $8, %esp

popl %ebx
addl %eax, %ebx

movl $1, %eax
int $0x80



.type power, @function
power:
pushl %ebp  
movl %esp, %ebp 
subl $4, %esp 
movl 8(%ebp), %ebx 
movl 12(%ebp), %ecx 
movl %ebx, -4(%ebp) 

power_loop_start:
cmpl …