如果我不关心任务完成的顺序,只需要完成它们,我还应该使用await Task.WhenAll而不是多个await吗?例如,DoWork2低于优选的方法DoWork1(以及为什么?):
using System;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace ConsoleApp
{
class Program
{
static async Task<string> DoTaskAsync(string name, int timeout)
{
var start = DateTime.Now;
Console.WriteLine("Enter {0}, {1}", name, timeout);
await Task.Delay(timeout);
Console.WriteLine("Exit {0}, {1}", name, (DateTime.Now - start).TotalMilliseconds);
return name;
}
static async Task DoWork1()
{
var t1 = DoTaskAsync("t1.1", 3000);
var t2 = DoTaskAsync("t1.2", 2000);
var t3 = DoTaskAsync("t1.3", 1000);
await t1; await t2; await t3;
Console.WriteLine("DoWork1 results: {0}", String.Join(", ", …Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud) .net c# parallel-processing task-parallel-library async-await
以下两段代码之间是否存在任何概念差异:
async Task TestAsync()
{
await Task.Run(() => DoSomeWork());
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
和
Task TestAsync()
{
return Task.Run(() => DoSomeWork());
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
生成的代码也不同吗?
编辑:为避免混淆Task.Run,类似的情况:
async Task TestAsync()
{
await Task.Delay(1000);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
和
Task TestAsync()
{
return Task.Delay(1000);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
最新更新:除了接受的答案之外,LocalCallContext处理方式也有所不同:即使没有异步,CallContext.LogicalGetData也会被恢复.为什么?