在POJO反序列化期间忽略@JsonTypeInfo属性

Ben*_*out 6 java jackson deserialization

我正在使用@JsonTypeInfo来指示Jackson 2.1.0查看'discriminator'属性中的具体类型信息.这很有效但在反序列化期间没有将鉴别器属性设置到POJO中.

根据同时杰克逊的Javadoc(com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonTypeInfo.Id),它应该:

/**
 * Property names used when type inclusion method ({@link As#PROPERTY}) is used
 * (or possibly when using type metadata of type {@link Id#CUSTOM}).
 * If POJO itself has a property with same name, value of property
 * will be set with type id metadata: if no such property exists, type id
 * is only used for determining actual type.
 *<p>
 * Default property name used if this property is not explicitly defined
 * (or is set to empty String) is based on
 * type metadata type ({@link #use}) used.
 */
public String property() default "";
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这是一项令人惊叹的测试

 @Test
public void shouldDeserializeDiscriminator() throws IOException {

    ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
    Dog dog = mapper.reader(Dog.class).readValue("{ \"name\":\"hunter\", \"discriminator\":\"B\"}");

    assertThat(dog).isInstanceOf(Beagle.class);
    assertThat(dog.name).isEqualTo("hunter");
    assertThat(dog.discriminator).isEqualTo("B"); //FAILS
}

@JsonTypeInfo(
        use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME,
        include = JsonTypeInfo.As.PROPERTY,
        property = "discriminator")
@JsonSubTypes({
        @JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Beagle.class, name = "B"),
        @JsonSubTypes.Type(value = Loulou.class, name = "L")
})
private static abstract class Dog {
    @JsonProperty("name")
    String name;
    @JsonProperty("discriminator")
    String discriminator;
}

private static class Beagle extends Dog {
}

private static class Loulou extends Dog {
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

有任何想法吗 ?

Sta*_*Man 19

像这样使用'visible'属性:

@JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.NAME,
    include = JsonTypeInfo.As.PROPERTY,
    property = "discriminator", visible=true)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

然后将公开type属性; 默认情况下,它们不可见,因此无需为此元数据添加显式属性.

  • 是; 主要是为了不在列表中的读者的利益. (4认同)
  • 有没有办法在杰克逊1.9中做到这一点? (2认同)