alw*_*btc 12 python exception-handling exception
我想要做:
try:
do()
except:
do2()
except:
do3()
except:
do4()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果do()失败,则执行do2(),如果do2()也失败,则执行do3()等等.
最好的祝福
Fre*_*ård 23
如果你真的不关心异常,你可以循环遍历案例直到你成功:
for fn in (do, do2, do3, do4):
try:
fn()
break
except:
continue
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这至少避免了每个案例都必须缩进一次.如果不同的函数需要不同的参数,你可以使用functools.partial在循环之前"填充"它们.
我会first()为此编写一个快速包装函数.
用法:value = first([f1, f2, f3, ..., fn], default='All failed')
#!/usr/bin/env
def first(flist, default=None):
""" Try each function in `flist` until one does not throw an exception, and
return the return value of that function. If all functions throw exceptions,
return `default`
Args:
flist - list of functions to try
default - value to return if all functions fail
Returns:
return value of first function that does not throw exception, or
`default` if all throw exceptions.
TODO: Also accept a list of (f, (exceptions)) tuples, where f is the
function as above and (exceptions) is a tuple of exceptions that f should
expect. This allows you to still re-raise unexpected exceptions.
"""
for f in flist:
try:
return f()
except:
continue
else:
return default
# Testing.
def f():
raise TypeError
def g():
raise IndexError
def h():
return 1
# We skip two exception-throwing functions and return value of the last.
assert first([f, g, h]) == 1
assert first([f, g, f], default='monty') == 'monty'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这似乎是一件非常奇怪的事情,但我可能会在没有异常的情况下循环使用函数并突破:
for func in [do, do2, do3]:
try:
func()
except Exception:
pass
else:
break
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
21222 次 |
| 最近记录: |