Dav*_*ave 1 python performance pypy timer
我正在编写一些使用Python进行排序算法比较的程序.我想测量平均排序时间.我第一次测量时遇到问题.
这个:
for i in xrange(self.repeats):
# random list generator
data_orig = [random.randint(0, self.size - 1) for x in xrange(self.size)]
sorter = self.class_()
data = data_orig[:]
debug("%s for data size: %d, try #%d" % (sorter.__class__.__name__, self.size, i+1))
t1 = time.clock()
sorter.sort(data)
t2 = time.clock()
debug("Took: %0.4fms, shifts: %d, comparisons: %d" % ((t2-t1)*1000.0, sorter.shifts, sorter.comps))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
class_
是对InsertionSort类的引用.对于size = 1000和5次重复,我得到以下结果:
InsertionSort for data size: 1000, try #1
Took: 39.5341ms, shifts: 254340, comparisons: 255331
InsertionSort for data size: 1000, try #2
Took: 6.0765ms, shifts: 250778, comparisons: 251772
InsertionSort for data size: 1000, try #3
Took: 6.9946ms, shifts: 254189, comparisons: 255180
InsertionSort for data size: 1000, try #4
Took: 6.7421ms, shifts: 252162, comparisons: 253156
InsertionSort for data size: 1000, try #5
Took: 5.9584ms, shifts: 241412, comparisons: 242404
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
对于每个排序算法,每次运行程序时,第一个结果都比其他结果大.我用PyPy运行它(使用Python似乎没问题,但速度慢得多).
我知道我可以简单地省略第一个结果,但这个解决方案不满足我:-)
有任何想法吗?
因为那是PyPy的重点.它是一个优化的即时编译器,这意味着运行一段代码越多,它就越优化.第一次运行它时,它没有机会进行任何优化,因此结果会很慢.后续运行将考虑从第一次学到的经验教训,因此会更快.